Remifentanil and controlled hypotension; comparison with nitroprusside or esmolol during tympanoplasty

被引:100
作者
Degoute, CS [1 ]
Ray, MJ
Manchon, M
Dubreuil, C
Banssillon, V
机构
[1] CHU Lyon Sud, Serv Anesthesie Reanimat, Dept Anesthesiol, F-69495 Pierre Benite, France
[2] CHU Lyon Sud, Serv Biochem, F-69495 Pierre Benite, France
[3] CHU Lyon Sud, Dept ENT Surg, F-69495 Pierre Benite, France
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE | 2001年 / 48卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03019809
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether remifentanil, combined with propofol, could induce controlled hypotension, reduce middle ear blood flow (MEBF) measured by laser-Doppler flowmetry, provide a "dry" operative field, and could be compared with nitroprusside or esmolol combined with alfentanil and propofol. Methods: Thirty patients undergoing tympanoplasty and anesthetized with 2.5 mg.kg(-1) propofol iv followed by a constant infusion of 120 mug.kg(-1.)min(-1), were randomly assigned in three groups to receive either 1 mug.kg(-1) remifentanil iv followed by a continuous infusion of 0.25 to 0.50 mug.kg(-1) min(-1) or nitroprusside iv, or esmolol iv combined for the latter two groups with alfentanil iv, Results: Controlled hypotension was achieved at the target pressure of 80 mmHg within 107 +/- 16, 69 +/- 4.4, 53.3 +/- 4.4 sec for remifentanil, nitroprusside and esmolol respectively, MEBF decreased by 24 +/- 0.3, 22 +/- 3.3, 37 +/- 3% and preceded the decrease in SABP within 30 +/- 6.1, 11.2 +/- 3.1, 15 +/- 2.8 sec for remifentanil, nitroprusside and esmolol respectively. Remifentanil, and nitroprusside decreased MEBF autoregulation less than esmolol (0.36 +/- 0.1, 0.19 +/- 0.2, -0.5 +/- 0.2). Controlled hypotension was sustained in all three groups throughout surgery, and the surgical field rating decreased in a range of 80% in all three groups. Nitroprusside decreased pH and increased PaCO2. There were no postoperative complications in any of the groups, Conclusions: Remifentanil combined with propofol enabled controlled hypotension, reduced middle ear blood flow and provided good surgical conditions for tympanoplasty with no need for additional use of a potent hypotensive agent.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 27
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   TACHYPHYLAXIS TO SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE [J].
AMARANATH, L ;
KELLERMEYER, WF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1976, 44 (04) :345-347
[2]   Intact cerebral blood flow reactivity during remifentanil nitrous oxide anesthesia [J].
Baker, KZ ;
Ostapkovich, N ;
Sisti, MB ;
Warner, DS ;
Young, WL .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 9 (02) :134-140
[3]  
BLAU WS, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V75, P172
[4]   COMPARISON OF SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE-INDUCED AND ESMOLOL-INDUCED CONTROLLED HYPOTENSION FOR FUNCTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY [J].
BOEZAART, AP .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (05) :373-376
[5]   A randomized multicenter study of remifentanil compared with alfentanil, isoflurane, or propofol in anesthetized pediatric patients undergoing elective strabismus surgery [J].
Davis, PJ ;
Lerman, J ;
Suresh, S ;
McGowan, FX ;
Cote, CJ ;
Landsman, I ;
Henson, LG .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (05) :982-989
[6]   Sympathetic nerve regulation of cochlear blood flow during increases in blood pressure in humans [J].
Degoute, CS ;
Preckel, MP ;
Dubreuil, C ;
Banssillon, V ;
Duclaux, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 75 (04) :326-332
[7]  
DEGOUTE CS, 1985, ANESTH ANALG, V64, P179
[8]   EFFECTS OF POSTURE, HYPOTENSION AND LOCALLY APPLIED VASOCONSTRICTION ON THE MIDDLE-EAR MICROCIRCULATION IN ANESTHETIZED HUMANS [J].
DEGOUTE, CS ;
DUBREUIL, C ;
RAY, MJ ;
GUITTON, J ;
MANCHON, M ;
BANSSILLON, V ;
SAUMET, JL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 69 (05) :414-420
[9]   Platelet function and adrenoceptors during and after induced hypotension using nitroprusside [J].
Dietrich, GV ;
Heesen, M ;
Boldt, J ;
Hempelmann, G .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (06) :1334-1340
[10]   SYMPATHETIC RESPONSES TO INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA IN HUMANS WITH PROPOFOL OR ETOMIDATE [J].
EBERT, TJ ;
MUZI, M ;
BERENS, R ;
GOFF, D ;
KAMPINE, JP .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (05) :725-733