Modified work and returns to work: A review of the literature

被引:235
作者
Krause, N
Dasinger, LK
Neuhauser, F
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Inst Publ Hlth, Berkeley, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, UC Data, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
disability; rehabilitation; reemployment;
D O I
10.1023/A:1023015622987
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Workplace injuries which result in lost time from work can have considerable financial repercussions for employer nad employee alike, not to mention their physical and emotional impact on the employee. In order to lessen workers' compensation costs and facilitate the rehabilitation process, some employers offer modified work to their injured employees in order to allow an earlier return to work than would ordinarily be possible. Although modified work is regarded by many as a cornerstone in the job rehabilitation process, little is known about the structure, effectiveness, and efficiency of such programs. This report is a systematic review of the scientific literature on modified work published since 1975. Its objective is to synthesize and critically appraise the research on modified work, and, specifically, to assess the effectiveness of modified work programs. Using a systematic keyword search in three online libraries, 29 empirical studies of modified work programs were selected for review. The studies were evaluated for methodological quality, from which 13 higher quality studies were identified. On the basis of these 13 studies, the effectiveness of modified work programs was evaluated. The main finding of this review is that modified work programs facilitate return to work for temporarily and permanently disabled workers. Injured workers who are offered modified work return to work about twice as often as those who are not. Similarly, modified work programs cut the number of lost work days in half. The available evidence also suggests that modified work programs are cost-effective. Comprehensive cost-benefit analyses are needed to confirm this findings.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 139
页数:27
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Baldwin ML, 1996, AM J IND MED, V29, P632
[2]   PSYCHOSOCIOECONOMIC PREDICTORS OF TREATMENT SUCCESS FAILURE IN CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN PATIENTS [J].
BARNES, D ;
SMITH, D ;
GATCHEL, RJ ;
MAYER, TG .
SPINE, 1989, 14 (04) :427-430
[3]   INDUSTRIAL INJURIES OF BACK AND EXTREMITIES - COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION - AID IN PROGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT - STUDY OF 180 PATIENTS [J].
BEALS, RK ;
HICKMAN, NW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1972, A 54 (08) :1593-1611
[4]  
Bendix AF, 1997, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V29, P81
[5]  
Bendix T, 1996, SCAND J MED SCI SPOR, V6, P88
[6]   MANAGING WORK DISABILITY - WHY 1ST RETURN TO WORK IS NOT A MEASURE OF SUCCESS [J].
BUTLER, RJ ;
JOHNSON, WG ;
BALDWIN, ML .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1995, 48 (03) :452-469
[7]   SPINAL PAIN REHABILITATION - INPATIENT AND OUTPATIENT TREATMENT RESULTS AND DEVELOPMENT OF PREDICTORS FOR OUTCOME [J].
CAIRNS, D ;
MOONEY, V ;
CRANE, P .
SPINE, 1984, 9 (01) :91-95
[8]  
CARADOCDAVIES TH, 1990, NEW ZEAL MED J, V103, P179
[9]  
CARADOCDAVIES TH, 1991, NEW ZEAL MED J, V104, P245
[10]   IDENTIFYING PATIENTS AT RISK OF BECOMING DISABLED BECAUSE OF LOW-BACK-PAIN - THE VERMONT REHABILITATION ENGINEERING CENTER PREDICTIVE MODEL [J].
CATSBARIL, WL ;
FRYMOYER, JW .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (06) :605-607