Comparison of 5 Different Remifentanil Strategies Against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury

被引:34
作者
Chun, Kook Jin [1 ]
Park, Yong Hyun [1 ]
Kim, Jeong Su [1 ]
Jang, Youngho [1 ]
Kim, June Hong [1 ]
Kim, Jun [1 ]
Lee, Mi Young [2 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Yangsan Hosp, Inst Cardiovasc Res, Yangsan Si, Gyeongsangnam D, South Korea
[2] Keimyung Univ, Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Taegu, South Korea
关键词
cardiodynamics; myocardial ischemia; preconditioning; postconditioning; remifentanil; DELTA-OPIOID RECEPTOR; INTACT RAT-HEART; CONFERS CARDIOPROTECTION; ACTIVATION; MORPHINE; PROTECTS; KAPPA; INHIBITION; INFARCTION; APOPTOSIS;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2011.02.019
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of various remifentanil strategies (preconditioning, postconditioning, or continuous infusion) against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Design: An in vitro experimental study using the Langendorff system. Setting: A university research laboratory. Participants: Male Sprague-Dawley rats (each n = 9). Interventions: Five different remifentanil strategies were performed in isolated rat hearts as follows: remifentanil preconditioning (R-Pre), remifentanil postconditioning (R-Post), ischemic targeting remifentanil (R1), reperfusion targeting remifentanil (R2), or both ischemic and reperfusion targeting remifentanil (R3). Infarct size and cardiodynamics were compared. Measurement and Main Results: The infarct-risk volume ratio in groups R-Pre (13.7% +/- 9.9%), R-Post (13.7% +/- 12.3%), and R3 (12.6% +/- 6.1%) were decreased significantly compared with the untreated control hearts (32.9% +/- 11.1%, p &lt 0.01). There was no significant difference in the left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) recovery after reperfusion between the control (43.6% +/- 14.5%) and R-Pre (34.8% +/- 12.9%, p > 0.05) groups after reperfusion. However, the LVDP recovery in R-Post (21.6% +/- 7.7%, p < 0.05), R1 (16.7% +/- 19.8%, p < 0.01), R2 (22.2% +/- 13.9%, p < 0.05), and R3 (16.2% +/- 7.8%, p < 0.01) was decreased significantly compared with control hearts. There was no significant difference in the recovery of dP/dt(max) after reperfusion between the R-Pre (42.0% +/- 16.9%) and control groups (39.0% +/- 15.4%, p > 0.05), whereas the dP/dt(max) in R3 group (16.9% +/- 9.0%) was decreased significantly compared with R-Pre (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Preconditioning or postconditioning by remifentanil and the continuous infusion of remifentanil effectively reduce myocardial infarction, whereas reperfusion targeting ischemic targeting or reperfusion targeting remifentanil does not. Remifentanil preconditioning better preserves myocardial function, especially LVDP, than other remifentanil strategies. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:926 / 930
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Attenuation of post-ischemia reperfusion injury by thaliporphine and morphine in rat hearts [J].
Chang, WL ;
Lee, SS ;
Su, MJ .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 12 (04) :611-619
[2]
Morphine postconditioning protects against reperfusion injury in the isolated rat hearts [J].
Chen, Zuolei ;
Li, Tianzuo ;
Zhang, Bingxi .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 145 (02) :287-294
[3]
Lidocaine reduces ischaemic but not reperfusion injury in isolated rat heart [J].
Ebel, D ;
Lipfert, P ;
Frässdorf, J ;
Preckel, B ;
Müllenheim, J ;
Thämer, V ;
Schlack, W .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 86 (06) :846-852
[4]
Myocardial protection with postconditioning is not enhanced by ischemic preconditioning [J].
Halkos, ME ;
Kerendi, F ;
Corvera, JS ;
Wang, NP ;
Kin, H ;
Payne, CS ;
Sun, HY ;
Guyton, RA ;
Vinten-Johansen, J ;
Zhao, ZQ .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 78 (03) :961-969
[5]
Postconditioning prevents Reperfusion injury by activating δ-opioid receptors [J].
Jang, Youngho ;
Xi, Jinkun ;
Wang, Huihua ;
Mueller, Robert A. ;
Norfleet, Edward A. ;
Xu, Zhelong .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2008, 108 (02) :243-250
[6]
Remifentanil Protects Myocardium through Activation of Anti-Apoptotic Pathways of Survival in Ischemia-Reperfused Rat Heart [J].
Kim, H. S. ;
Cho, J. E. ;
Hong, S. W. ;
Kim, S. O. ;
Shim, J. K. ;
Kwak, Y. L. .
PHYSIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 59 (03) :347-356
[7]
Remifentanil limits infarct size but attenuates preconditioning-induced infarct limitation [J].
Kuzume, K ;
Kuzume, K ;
Wolff, RA ;
Chien, GL ;
Van Winkle, DM .
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2004, 15 (07) :449-455
[8]
Inhibition of myocardial apoptosis by ischaemic and beta-adrenergic preconditioning is dependent on p38 MAPK [J].
Moolman, JA ;
Hartley, S ;
Van Wyk, J ;
Marais, E ;
Lochner, A .
CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS AND THERAPY, 2006, 20 (01) :13-25
[9]
Ischemic preconditioning and morphine attenuate myocardial apoptosis and infarction after ischemia-reperfusion in rabbits:: role of δ-opioid receptor [J].
Okubo, S ;
Tanabe, Y ;
Takeda, K ;
Kitayama, M ;
Kanemitsu, S ;
Kukreja, RC ;
Takekoshi, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 287 (04) :H1786-H1791
[10]
N6-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5′-N-methylcarboxamide confers cardioprotection at reperfusion by inhibiting mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening via glycogen synthase kinase 3β [J].
Park, Sung-Sik ;
Zhao, Hong ;
Jang, Yeongho ;
Mueller, Robert A. ;
Xu, Zhelong .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 318 (01) :124-131