Techno-economic Analysis of Distributed Hydrogen Production from Natural Gas

被引:40
作者
Luk Ho Ting [1 ]
Lei Ho Man [1 ]
Ng Wai Yee [1 ]
Ju Yihan [1 ]
Lam Koon Fung [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
gas station; cost analysis; steam reforming; ammonia cracking; FUEL-CELLS; METHANOL;
D O I
10.1016/S1004-9541(11)60210-3
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
081705 [工业催化];
摘要
It is well established that hydrogen has the potential to make a significant contribution to the world energy production. In U.S., majority of hydrogen production plants implement steam methane reforming (SMR) for centralized hydrogen production. However, there is a wide lack of agreement on the nascent stage of using hydrogen as fuel in vehicles industry because of the difficulty in delivery and storage. By performing technological and economic analysis, this work aims to establish the most feasible hydrogen production pathway for automotives in near future. From the evaluation, processes such as thermal cracking of ammonia and centralized hydrogen production followed by bulk delivery are eliminated while on-site steam reforming of methanol and natural gas are the most technologically feasible options. These two processes are further evaluated by comprehensive economic analysis. The results showed that the steam reforming (SR) of natural gas has a shorter payback time and a higher return on investment (ROI) and internal rate of return (IRR). Sensitivity analysis has also been constructed to evaluate the impact of variables like NG feedstock price, capital of investment and operating capacity factor on the overall production cost of hydrogen. Based on this study, natural gas is prompted to be the most economically and technologically available raw material for short-term hydrogen production before the transition to renewable energy source such as solar energy, biomass and wind power.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 496
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]
Membrane reforming for hydrogen [J].
Aasberg-Petersen, K ;
Nielsen, CS ;
Jorgensen, SL .
CATALYSIS TODAY, 1998, 46 (2-3) :193-201
[2]
Aceves S.M., 2005, VD STORAGE FY 2005 P
[3]
Hydrogen and methanol: a comparison of safety, economics, efficiencies and emissions [J].
Adamson, KA ;
Pearson, P .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2000, 86 (1-2) :548-555
[4]
H2 production by steam reforming of methanol over Cu/ZnO/Al2) catalysts:: transient deactivation kinetics modeling [J].
Agarwal, V ;
Patel, S ;
Pant, KK .
APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL, 2005, 279 (1-2) :155-164
[5]
[Anonymous], 2009, WORLD HYDR FUEL STAT
[6]
APPL M, 1972, CHEM ZTG, V96, P135
[7]
ATTARIAN J, 2002, SOCIAL CONTRACT, P276
[8]
An economic survey of hydrogen production from conventional and alternative energy sources [J].
Bartels, Jeffrey R. ;
Pate, Michael B. ;
Olson, Norman K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2010, 35 (16) :8371-8384
[9]
An experimental investigation on methanol steam reforming with oxygen addition in a flat Pd-Ag membrane reactor [J].
Basile, A. ;
Tereschenko, G. F. ;
Orekhova, N. V. ;
Ermilova, M. M. ;
Gallucci, F. ;
Iulianelli, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2006, 31 (12) :1615-1622
[10]
Evaluation of membrane reactor with hydrogen-selective membrane in methane steam reforming [J].
Bernardo, P. ;
Barbieri, G. ;
Drioli, E. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2010, 65 (03) :1159-1166