Appropriability regime for radical and incremental innovations

被引:121
作者
Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, Pia [1 ,2 ]
Sainio, Liisa-Maija [2 ]
Jauhiainen, Tiina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Fac Econ & Business Adm, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
[2] Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Sch Business, FI-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00513.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the present day markets, new product development and innovation are essential for value creation. Innovation, however, hardly provides benefits if rivals are able to copy it with little or no extra cost. Consequently, being able to build an appropriability regime that provides effective protection against imitation and enables getting returns on investments in innovation is necessary. The problem is that choosing the methods to protect different kinds of innovations is not straightforward. In this paper we study appropriating from radical and incremental innovations. It is widely known that many significant differences exist between the two innovation types, and the appropriability conditions are no exception. Empirical evidence on the topic is provided by analyzing survey data collected among 299 companies. As a result, the effects of environmental dynamism and research and development (R&D) intensity on radical and incremental innovation are illustrated, and knowledge is provided on the role of the appropriability regime in enhancing the potential to profit from radical and incremental innovations.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 289
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   INNOVATION - MAPPING THE WINDS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION [J].
ABERNATHY, WJ ;
CLARK, KB .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1985, 14 (01) :3-22
[2]   When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition [J].
Adner, R .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (08) :667-688
[3]   TECHNOLOGICAL DISCONTINUITIES AND DOMINANT DESIGNS - A CYCLICAL MODEL OF TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE [J].
ANDERSON, P ;
TUSHMAN, ML .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (04) :604-633
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, J TECHNOLOGY TRANSFE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, OSL MAN PROP GUID CO
[6]  
Arrow KJ, 1962, Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, P609, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400879762-024
[7]   The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation [J].
Arundel, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2001, 30 (04) :611-624
[8]   Protecting intellectual capital in international alliances [J].
Baughn, CC ;
Denekamp, JG ;
Stevens, JH ;
Osborn, RN .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 1997, 32 (02) :103-117
[9]   Intellectual property rights and standardization: the case of GSM [J].
Bekkers, R ;
Verspagen, B ;
Smits, J .
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY, 2002, 26 (3-4) :171-188