Criticality of the Geological Copper Family

被引:127
作者
Nassar, Nedal T. [1 ]
Barr, Rachel [1 ]
Browning, Matthew [1 ]
Diao, Zhouwei [1 ]
Friedlander, Elizabeth [1 ]
Harper, E. M. [1 ]
Henly, Claire [1 ]
Kavlak, Goksin [1 ]
Kwatra, Sameer [1 ]
Jun, Christine [1 ]
Warren, Simon [1 ]
Yang, Man-Yu [1 ]
Graedel, T. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, Ctr Ind Ecol, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es203535w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Because modern technology depends on reliable supplies of a wide variety of materials, and because of increasing concern about those supplies, a comprehensive methodology has been created to quantify the degree of criticality of the metals of the periodic table. In this paper, we apply this methodology to the elements of the geological copper family: Cu, As, Se, Ag, Te, and Au. These elements are technologically important, but show a substantial variation in different factors relating to their supply risk, vulnerability to supply restriction, and environmental implications. Assessments are made on corporate, national, and global levels for year 2008. Evaluations of each of the multiple indicators are presented and the results plotted in "criticality space", together with Monte Carlo simulation-derived "uncertainty cloud" estimates for each of the aggregated evaluations. For supply risk over both the medium term and long term, As is the highest risk of the six metals, with Se and Ag nearly as high. Gold has the most severe environmental implications ranking. Vulnerability to supply restriction (VSR) at the corporate level for an invented solar cell manufacturing firm shows Se, Te, and Cu as approximately equal, Cu has the highest VSR at the national level, and Cu and Au have the highest VSRs at the global level. Criticality vector magnitudes are greatest at the global level for As (and then Au and Ag) and at the national level for As and Au; at the corporate level, Se is highest with Te and Cu lower. An extension of this work, now in progress, will provide criticality estimates for several different development scenarios for the period 2010-2050.
引用
收藏
页码:1071 / 1078
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, Minerals, critical minerals, and the US economy
  • [2] Bae J. C., 2010, CRIT EL NEW EN TECHN
  • [3] Critical Raw Materials for the EU, 2010, CRIT RAW MAT EU REP
  • [4] Criticality of Non-Fuel Minerals: A Review of Major Approaches and Analyses
    Erdmann, Lorenz
    Graedel, Thomas E.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (18) : 7620 - 7630
  • [5] Goedkoop M., 2009, RECIPE 2008 MAIN R 1
  • [6] Methodology of Metal Criticality Determination
    Graedel, T. E.
    Barr, Rachel
    Chandler, Chelsea
    Chase, Thomas
    Choi, Joanne
    Christoffersen, Lee
    Friedlander, Elizabeth
    Henly, Claire
    Jun, Christine
    Nassar, Nedal T.
    Schechner, Daniel
    Warren, Simon
    Yang, Man-yu
    Zhu, Charles
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (02) : 1063 - 1070
  • [7] Hischier R, 2010, 3 SWISS CTR LIF CYCL
  • [8] Morley Nick., 2008, Material Security: Ensuring resource availability for the UK economy
  • [9] New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), 2009, 080078350 NEDO SHINK
  • [10] Pfleger P., 2009, ROHSTOFFSITUATION BA