Neural images of pursuit targets in the photoreceptor arrays of male and female houseflies Musca domestica

被引:39
作者
Burton, BG [1 ]
Laughlin, SB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
关键词
photoreceptor; target; tracking; retina; coding; housefly;
D O I
10.1242/jeb.00600
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Male houseflies use a sex-specific frontal eye region, the lovespot, to detect and pursue mates. We recorded the electrical responses of photoreceptors to optical stimuli that simulate the signals received by a male or female photoreceptor as a conspecific passes through its field of view. We analysed the ability of male and female frontal photoreceptors to code conspecifics over the range of speeds and distances encountered during pursuit, and reconstructed the neural images of these targets in photoreceptor arrays. A male's lovespot photoreceptor detects a conspecific at twice the distance of a female photoreceptor, largely through better optics. This detection distance greatly exceeds those reported in previous behavioural studies. Lovespot photoreceptors respond more strongly than female photoreceptors to targets tracked during pursuit, with amplitudes reaching 25 mV. The male photoreceptor also has a faster response, exhibits a unique preference for stimuli of 20-30 ms duration that selects for conspecifics; and deblurs moving images with response transients. White-noise analysis substantially underestimates these improvements. We conclude that in the lovespot, both optics and phototransduction are specialised to enhance and deblur the neural images of moving targets, and propose that analogous mechanisms may sharpen the neural image still further as it is transferred to visual interneurones.
引用
收藏
页码:3963 / 3977
页数:15
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   WHAT DOES THE RETINA KNOW ABOUT NATURAL SCENES [J].
ATICK, JJ ;
REDLICH, AN .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1992, 4 (02) :196-210
[2]   A QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF INTERACTIONS BETWEEN PHOTORECEPTORS IN THE SALAMANDER (AMBYSTOMA) RETINA [J].
ATTWELL, D ;
WILSON, M ;
WU, SM .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1984, 352 (JUL) :703-737
[3]  
BRAITENBERG V, 1972, INFORMATION PROCESSI, P3
[4]   Variations in photoreceptor response dynamics across the fly retina [J].
Burton, BG ;
Tatler, BW ;
Laughlin, SB .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 86 (02) :950-960
[5]  
CAMHI JM, 1984, NEUROETHOLOGY NERVE
[6]   AMPLIFICATION OF SMALL SIGNALS BY VOLTAGE-GATED SODIUM-CHANNELS IN DRONE PHOTORECEPTORS [J].
COLES, JA ;
SCHNEIDERPICARD, G .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 165 (01) :109-118
[7]   HOW HOVERFLIES COMPUTE INTERCEPTION COURSES [J].
COLLETT, TS ;
LAND, MF .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 1978, 125 (03) :191-204
[8]   Tuning of photoreceptor spectral sensitivity in fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) [J].
Cronin, TW ;
Järvilehto, M ;
Weckström, M ;
Lall, AB .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 186 (01) :1-12
[9]   THE LINEAR DYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF PHOTOTRANSDUCTION IN THE FLY COMPOUND EYE [J].
FRENCH, AS .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1980, 308 (NOV) :385-401
[10]   Motion blur and motion sharpening: temporal smear and local contrast non-linearity [J].
Hammett, ST ;
Georgeson, MA ;
Gorea, A .
VISION RESEARCH, 1998, 38 (14) :2099-2108