Support vector machines (SVMs) for monitoring network design

被引:34
作者
Asefa, T
Kemblowski, M
Urroz, G
McKee, M
机构
[1] Tampa Bay Water, Clearwater, FL 33761 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Utah Water Res Lab, Logan, UT 84321 USA
[3] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Logan, UT 84321 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.0050.x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In this paper we present a hydrologic application of a new statistical learning methodology called support vector machines (SVMs). SVMs are based on minimization of a bound on the generalized error (risk) model, rather than just the mean square error over a training set. Due to Mercer's conditions on the kernels, the corresponding optimization problems are convex and hence have no local minima. In this paper, SVMs are illustratively used to reproduce the behavior of Monte Carlo-based flow and transport models that are in turn used in the design of a ground water contamination detection monitoring system. The traditional approach, which is based on solving transient transport equations for each new configuration of a conductivity field, is too time consuming in practical applications. Thus, there is a need to capture the behavior of the transport phenomenon in random media in a relatively simple manner. The objective of the exercise is to maximize the probability of detecting contaminants that exceed some regulatory standard before they reach a compliance boundary, while minimizing cost (i.e., number of monitoring wells). Application of the method at a generic site showed a rather promising performance, which leads us to believe that SVMs could be successfully employed in other areas of hydrology. The SVM was trained using 510 monitoring configuration samples generated from 200 Monte Carlo flow and transport realizations. The best configurations of well networks selected by the SVM were identical with the ones obtained from the physical model, but the reliabilities provided by the respective networks differ slightly.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 422
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Optimal ground-water detection monitoring system design under uncertainty [J].
Angulo, M ;
Tang, WH .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 125 (06) :510-517
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS, PERSPECTIVES IN NEURAL COMPUTING
[3]  
Boser B. E., 1992, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, P144, DOI 10.1145/130385.130401
[4]  
Church R., 1974, PAPERS REGIONAL SCI, V32, P101, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01942293, DOI 10.1111/J.1435-5597.1974.TB00902.X]
[5]  
Cristianini N., 2000, Intelligent Data Analysis: An Introduction, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511801389
[6]   Chance-constrained optimal monitoring network design for pollutants in ground water [J].
Datta, B ;
Dhiman, SD .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1996, 122 (03) :180-188
[7]   Model induction with support vector machines: Introduction and applications [J].
Dibike, YB ;
Velickov, S ;
Solomatine, D ;
Abbott, MB .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2001, 15 (03) :208-216
[8]  
EJAZ MS, 1995, WATER RESOUR RES, V31, P1087, DOI 10.1029/94WR02980
[9]  
Govindaraju RS, 2000, J HYDROL ENG, V5, P124
[10]  
HARBAUGH AW, 1996, 96485 USGS