Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: How many tests do we need?

被引:13
作者
Michiels, JJ
Gadisseur, A
van der Planken, M
Schroyens, W
Berneman, Z
De Maeseneer, M
Hermsen, JT
Trienekens, PH
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Hematol, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Hemostasis Lab, Dept Biol Clin, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium
[3] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Vasc Lab, Dept Vasc Surg, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium
[4] Med Diagnost Ctr Rijnmond, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Hemostasis Thrombosis Sci Ctr, Goodheart Inst, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
deep vein thrombosis; D-dimer assay; ultrasonography; clinical score;
D O I
10.1080/00015458.2005.11679661
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The requirement for a safe diagnostic strategy should be based on an overall post-test incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of less than 1% during 3 month follow-up. Compression ultrasonography (CUS) has a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97 to 98% indicating a post-CUS incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of 2 to 3%. A post-CUS DVT incidence of 3% implicates that 90 to 120 DVTs per 1 million inhabitants will be overlooked each year indicating the need to improve the diagnostic work-up of DVT as much as possible. The qualitative D-dimer test (SimpliRed) has a sensitivity of 82 to 89% and a negative predictive value of 94 to 95% indicating a 5 to 6% post-test incidence of DVT, which is not sensitive enough for venous thrombosis exclusion. The post-test DVT incidence could be reduced from 3.2% to 0.6% in one study and from 11% to 2% in another study by the combination of a normal CUS and low clinical score and from 4,5% to 1.6% by the combination of low clinical score and a negative SimpliRed test in one study. The combination of a negative CUS and a negative SimpliRed test reduced the post-test incidence of DVT from 2.6% to < 1% or even < 1 parts per thousand in two management studies without the need of a repeated CUS on the basis of which anticoagulant therapy can safely be withheld. The rapid quantitative turbidimetric D-dimer assay (Tinaquant) has a sensitivity and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.7% with a 2.3% post-test incidence of DVT. The combination of a normal Tinaquant D-Dimer test result plus a low to moderate clinical score reduces the post-test incidence of DVT from 2.3 to 0,6% without the need of CUS testing in 29% of patients with suspected DVT. The rapid ELISA VIDAS D-dimer assay has a sensitivity and NPV of 98,6 and 99.5% in two management studies for the exclusion of DVT irrespective of clinical score. The combination of a normal ELISA VIDAS D-Dimer test with clinical score assessment will reduce the post-test DVT incidence of less than 0.5% and the need for CUS testing by 40 to 50%. It is concluded that the sequential use of a rapid quantitative D-dimer test, clinical score and CUS appears to be safe and the most cost-effective diagnostic work-up of DVT.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 25
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
Combined use of clinical assessment and D-dimer to improve the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected deep vein thrombosis - (the EDITED Study) [J].
Anderson, DR ;
Kovacs, MJ ;
Kovacs, G ;
Stiell, I ;
Mitchell, M ;
Khoury, V ;
Dryer, J ;
Ward, J ;
Wells, PS .
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2003, 1 (04) :645-651
[2]
The clinical validity of normal compression ultrasonography in outpatients suspected of raving deep venous thrombosis [J].
Birdwell, BG ;
Raskob, GE ;
Whitsett, TL ;
Durica, SS ;
Comp, PC ;
George, JN ;
Tytle, TL ;
McKee, PA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 128 (01) :1-+
[3]
Compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis:: prospective cohort study [J].
Cogo, A ;
Lensing, AWA ;
Koopman, MMW ;
Piovella, F ;
Siragusa, S ;
Wells, PS ;
Villalta, S ;
Büller, HR ;
Turpie, AGG ;
Prandoni, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7124) :17-20
[4]
DISTRIBUTION OF THROMBOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS - IMPLICATIONS FOR SIMPLIFYING THE DIAGNOSTIC PROCESS WITH COMPRESSION ULTRASOUND [J].
COGO, A ;
LENSING, AWA ;
PRANDONI, P ;
HIRSH, J .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 153 (24) :2777-2780
[5]
Constans J, 2001, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V86, P985
[6]
Clinical prediction of deep venous thrombosis using two risk assessment methods in combination with rapid quantitative D-dimer testing [J].
Cornuz, J ;
Ghali, WA ;
Hayoz, D ;
Stoianov, R ;
Depairon, M ;
Yersin, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 112 (03) :198-203
[7]
Freyburger G, 1998, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V79, P32
[8]
CLINICAL VALIDITY OF A NEGATIVE VENOGRAM IN PATIENTS WITH CLINICALLY SUSPECTED VENOUS-THROMBOSIS [J].
HULL, R ;
HIRSH, J ;
SACKETT, DL ;
TAYLOR, DW ;
CARTER, C ;
TURPIE, AGG ;
POWERS, P ;
GENT, M .
CIRCULATION, 1981, 64 (03) :622-625
[9]
Simplification of the diagnostic management of suspected deep vein thrombosis [J].
Kraaijenhagen, RA ;
Piovella, F ;
Bernardi, E ;
Verlato, F ;
Beckers, EAM ;
Koopman, MMW ;
Barone, M ;
Camporese, G ;
van Loon, BJP ;
Prins, MH ;
Prandoni, P ;
Büller, HR .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 162 (08) :907-911
[10]
CLINICAL FINDINGS ASSOCIATED WITH ACUTE PROXIMAL DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS - A BASIS FOR QUANTIFYING CLINICAL JUDGMENT [J].
LANDEFELD, CS ;
MCGUIRE, E ;
COHEN, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 88 (04) :382-388