Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research

被引：186

作者：

Seglen, PO

机构：

[1] NIFU, Inst Studies Res & Higher Educ, NO-0352 Oslo, Norway

[2] Norwegian Radium Hosp, Inst Canc Res, NO-0310 Oslo, Norway

来源：

ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA | 1998年 / 69卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.3109/17453679809000920

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：224 / 229

页数：6

共 47 条

[1]

Andersen H, 1996, DANSK SOCIOLOGI, V2, P72

[2]

ANDERSEN H, 1996, BIBLIOTEKSARBEJDE, V17, P19

[3]

Science indicators derived from databases - The case of the social sciences [J].

Artus, HM .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 1996, 37 (02) :297-311

[4]

Standards issues in a national bibliometric database: The Australian case [J].

Bourke, P ;

Butler, L .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 1996, 35 (02) :199-207

[5]

THE SCIENTOMETRIC WEIGHT OF 50 NATIONS IN 27 SCIENCE AREAS, 1989-1993 .2. LIFE SCIENCES [J].

BRAUN, T ;

GLANZEL, W ;

GRUPP, H .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 1995, 34 (02) :207-237

[6]

CHANCE AND CONSENSUS IN PEER-REVIEW [J].

COLE, S ;

COLE, JR ;

SIMON, GA .

SCIENCE, 1981, 214 (4523) :881-886

[7]

DRAWBACKS OF PEER-REVIEW [J].

ERNST, E ;

SARADETH, T ;

RESCH, KL .

NATURE, 1993, 363 (6427) :296-296

[8]

QUOTATIONAL AND REFERENCE ACCURACY IN SURGICAL JOURNALS - A CONTINUING PEER-REVIEW PROBLEM [J].

EVANS, JT ;

NADJARI, HI ;

BURCHELL, SA .

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 263 (10) :1353-1354

[9]

SOME METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS IN RANKING SCIENTISTS BY CITATION ANALYSIS [J].

FOLLY, G ;

HAJTMAN, B ;

NAGY, JI ;

RUFF, I .

SCIENTOMETRICS, 1981, 3 (02) :135-147

[10]

CITATION ANALYSIS AS A TOOL IN JOURNAL EVALUATION - JOURNALS CAN BE RANKED BY FREQUENCY AND IMPACT OF CITATIONS FOR SCIENCE POLICY STUDIES [J].

GARFIELD, E .

SCIENCE, 1972, 178 (4060) :471-+

← 1 2 3 4 5 →