Determination of relative economic weights for multitrait selection in coastal Douglas-fir

被引:52
作者
Aubry, CA
Adams, WT
Fahey, TD
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, USDA, Olympia, WA 98512 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[3] US Forest Serv, Pacific NW Res Stn, USDA, Portland, OR 97208 USA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE | 1998年 / 28卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1139/cjfr-28-8-1164
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Relationships between tree traits and tree value for lumber production were investigated. For the purposes of estimating relative economic weights for use in multitrait selection in coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) France var. menziesii), tree height, diameter at breast height, and branch diameter were measured on 164 trees (ages 36-66 years). Increment cores from a subsample (92) of these trees were assayed by X-ray densitometry to determine wood density. Bole volume was derived by summing the log volumes of all logs from each tree. Value of lumber recovered from each tree was determined in a separate mill study using both visual and machine stress rated (MSR) grading rules. Multiple linear regression was used to relate tree value to the growth and wood quality traits. Stem volume and branch diameter significantly influenced tree value under visual grading, with relative economic weights of 0.06 dm(3) and -5.22 cm, respectively. Wood density significantly influenced tree value under MSR grading (relative economic weights: 0.06 dm(3), -6.69 cm, and 0.06 kg/m(3), respectively), where lumber strength is measured more accurately. These regression coefficients can be used directly as economic weights in selection indices.
引用
收藏
页码:1164 / 1170
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P S DOUGL STAND MAN
[2]  
AUBRY CA, 1992, THESIS OREGON STATE
[3]  
Baker RJ, 1986, SELECTION INDICES PL, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429280498
[4]   FOREST MANAGEMENT AND END-PRODUCT QUALITY - A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE [J].
BARBOUR, RJ ;
KELLOGG, RM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1990, 20 (04) :405-414
[5]  
BRIDGWATER FE, 1983, SILVAE GENET, V32, P157
[6]  
BRIDGWATER FE, 1979, P SO FOR TREE IMPROV, V15, P132
[7]  
BRIGGS DG, 1992, FOREST PROD J, V42, P40
[8]  
BRUCE D, 1982, FOREST SCI, V28, P489
[9]  
CHOLLET F, 1987, P C BREED THEOR PROG, P567
[10]  
CHRISTOPHE C, 1983, SILVAE GENET, V32, P173