Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype as a Predictor of the Utility of Preoperative MRI

被引:46
作者
Ha, Richard [1 ]
Jin, Brian [1 ]
Mango, Victoria [1 ]
Friedlander, Lauren [1 ]
Miloshev, Vesco [1 ]
Malak, Sharp [2 ]
Wynn, Ralph [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Little Rock, AR 72204 USA
关键词
breast cancer; breast MRI; ERBB2; immunohistochemical staining; molecular subtype; NIPPLE-SPARING MASTECTOMY; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; LYMPH-NODE METASTASES; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; AXILLARY ULTRASOUND; AREOLA COMPLEX; FOLLOW-UP; MAMMOGRAPHY; RISK; INVOLVEMENT;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.14.13666
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to discern whether breast cancer molecular subtype, a known prognostic indicator, can be used to select patients with the highest likelihood of having clinically significant additional findings on breast MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A database review from January 2010 through December 2013 identified 299 patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI with tumors classifiable into molecular subtypes. Subtypes were classified on the basis of immunohistochemical staining surrogates as luminal A (hormone receptor [ER or PR] positive, ERBB2 [formerly HER2 or HER2/neu] negative, luminal B (hormone receptor positive, ERBB2 positive), ERBB2 (hormone receptor negative, ERBB2 positive), or basal (hormone receptor and ERBB2 negative). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between subtype and additional breast MRI findings, including multicentric or multifocal disease, contralateral disease, chest wall involvement, skin and nipple involvement, and internal mammary and axillary lymphadenopathy. RESULTS. The subtype distribution was luminal A, 70.6% (211/299); luminal B, 14.1% (42/299); ERBB2, 5.4% (16/299); and basal, 10.0% (30/299). ERBB2 and luminal B subtypes were more often associated with multicentric disease (25.0% and 26.2%), multifocal disease (37.5% and 35.7%), and axillary disease (50.0% and 45.2%) than were luminal A cancers (multicentric disease, 10.9%; multifocal disease 20.4%; axillary disease, 22.7%) (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, after control for patient age, tumor size, and nuclear grade, patients with ERBB2-overexpressing tumors were 2.4 times as likely as patients with luminal A tumors to have multicentric disease (p = 0.016), 2.0 times as likely to have multifocal disease (p = 0.024), 1.7 times as likely to have skin and nipple involvement (p = 0.013), and 1.9 times as likely to have axillary disease (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION. Preoperative MRI may most benefit patients with tumors with ERBB2 overexpression because of the increased likelihood of the presence of additional disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1354 / 1360
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2013, GUID IM PAT PRES BRE
[2]
Age, Breast Cancer Subtype Approximation, and Local Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Therapy [J].
Arvold, Nils D. ;
Taghian, Alphonse G. ;
Niemierko, Andrzej ;
Raad, Rita F. Abi ;
Sreedhara, Meera ;
Nguyen, Paul L. ;
Bellon, Jennifer R. ;
Wong, Julia S. ;
Smith, Barbara L. ;
Harris, Jay R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (29) :3885-3891
[3]
Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer [J].
Berg, WA ;
Gutierrez, L ;
NessAiver, MS ;
Carter, WB ;
Bhargavan, M ;
Lewis, RS ;
Ioffe, OB .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) :830-849
[4]
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging As It Is, in Contrast to How We Wish It to Be [J].
Bleicher, Richard J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (05) :370-372
[5]
BREAST-TUMORS - COMPARATIVE ACCURACY OF MR-IMAGING RELATIVE TO MAMMOGRAPHY AND US FOR DEMONSTRATING EXTENT [J].
BOETES, C ;
MUS, RDM ;
HOLLAND, R ;
BARENTSZ, JO ;
STRIJK, SP ;
WOBBES, T ;
HENDRIKS, JHCL ;
RUYS, SHJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (03) :743-747
[6]
Occult Nipple Involvement in Breast Cancer: Clinicopathologic Findings in 316 Consecutive Mastectomy Specimens [J].
Brachtel, Elena F. ;
Rusby, Jennifer E. ;
Michaelson, James S. ;
Chen, L. Leon ;
Muzikansky, Alona ;
Smith, Barbara L. ;
Koerner, Frederick C. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (30) :4948-4954
[7]
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of the Contralateral Breast in Women With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incremental Cancer Detection and Impact on Surgical Management [J].
Brennan, Meagan Elizabeth ;
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Lord, Sarah ;
Macaskill, Petra ;
Irwig, Les ;
Dixon, J. Michael ;
Warren, Ruth M. L. ;
Ciatto, Stefano .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (33) :5640-5649
[8]
Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: Ready for clinical application? [J].
Brenton, JD ;
Carey, LA ;
Ahmed, AA ;
Caldas, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (29) :7350-7360
[9]
Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Livasy, Chad A. ;
Dressler, Lynn G. ;
Cowan, David ;
Conway, Kathleen ;
Karaca, Gamze ;
Troester, Melissa A. ;
Tse, Chiu Kit ;
Edmiston, Sharon ;
Deming, Sandra L. ;
Geradts, Joseph ;
Cheang, Maggie C. U. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
Moorman, Patricia G. ;
Earp, H. Shelton ;
Millikan, Robert C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (21) :2492-2502
[10]
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Update One Hundred Forty-Nine Procedures and Clinical Outcomes [J].
Crowe, Joseph P. ;
Patrick, Rebecca J. ;
Yetman, Randall J. ;
Djohan, Risal .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2008, 143 (11) :1106-1110