Characterizing ammonia emissions from swine farms in eastern North Carolina: Reduction of emissions from water-holding structures at two candidate superior technologies for waste treatment

被引:15
作者
Aneja, Viney P. [1 ]
Arya, S. Pal [1 ]
Rumsey, Ian C. [1 ]
Kim, D-S. [1 ]
Bajwa, K. S. [1 ]
Williams, C. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Marine Earth & Atmospher Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Anim & Poultry Waste Management Ctr, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
ammonia emissions; ammonia flux; water-holding structures; environmentally superior technologies (ESTs); lagoon and spray technologies (LSTs);
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.08.037
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Program OPEN (Odor, Pathogens, and Emissions of Nitrogen) was an integrated study of the emissions of ammonia (NH(3)) odor and odorants, and pathogens from potential environmentally superior technologies (ESTs) for swine facilities in eastern North Carolina. This paper, as part of program OPEN, focuses on quantifying emissions of NH3 from water-holding structures at two of the best ESTs and compares them with the projected emissions from two conventional lagoon and spray technologies (LSTs). The evaluated ESTs are: (1) Super Soils at Goshen Ridge; and (2) Environmental Technologies at Red Hill. The water-holding structures for these two ESTs contained no conventional anaerobic lagoon. A dynamic flow-through chamber was used to measure NH(3) fluxes from the water-holding structures at both the ESTs and at the conventional LST farms. In order to compare the emissions from the water-holding structures at the ESTs with those from the lagoons at the conventional sites under similar conditions, a statistical-observational model for lagoon NH(3) emissions was used. A mass-balance approach was used to quantify the emissions. All emissions were normalized by nitrogen-excretion rates. The percentage reductions relative to the conventional lagoons were calculated for the two ESTs. Results showed substantial reductions in NH(3) emissions at both ESTs. Super Soils had reductions of 94.7% for the warm season and 99.0% for the cool season. Environmental Technologies had slightly larger reductions of 99.4% and 99.98% for the cool and warm season, respectively. As a result of such large reductions in ammonia emissions, both technologies meet the criteria to be classified as ESTs for ammonia emissions. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3291 / 3300
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Characterization of atmospheric ammonia emissions from swine waste storage and treatment lagoons [J].
Aneja, VP ;
Chauhan, JP ;
Walker, JT .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D9) :11535-11545
[2]  
ANEJA VP, 2006, P WORKSH AGR AIR QUA, P27695
[3]  
ANEJA VP, 2007, J AIR WASTE IN PRESS
[4]  
Aneja VP., 2006, EOS T AM GEOPHYS UN, V87, P25, DOI DOI 10.1029/2006EO030001
[5]  
ANEJA VP, 1998, P WORKSH ATM NITR CO
[6]   A global high-resolution emission inventory for ammonia [J].
Bouwman, AF ;
Lee, DS ;
Asman, WAH ;
Dentener, FJ ;
VanderHoek, KW ;
Olivier, JGJ .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 1997, 11 (04) :561-587
[7]  
OLIVER JGJ, 1996, 771060002 RIVM NAT I
[8]  
*PIGCHAMP INC, 1999, NAT SUMM REP
[9]  
WARNECK P, 2000, CHEM NATURAL ATMOSPH, P484
[10]  
Williams C. M., 2006, DEV ENV SUPERIOR TEC