Relationship between viscoelastic and peeling properties of model adhesives. Part 2. The interfacial fracture domains

被引:43
作者
Derail, C
Allal, A
Marin, G [1 ]
Tordjeman, P
机构
[1] Univ Pau & Pays Adour, Lab Phys Mat Ind, F-64000 Pau, France
[2] ELFAtochem, Grp Rech Lacq, F-64170 Lacq, France
关键词
hot-melt adhesives; pressure-sensitive adhesives; adhesive joints; peeling viscoelasticity; rheology; cohesive failure; interfacial failure; stick-slip; adhesive formulation; master curve; peeling and rheological parameters; trumpet model of de Gennes; complex shear modulus; time-temperature equivalence; blends of monodisperse polybutadiene with tackifying resin; mechanical spectroscopy;
D O I
10.1080/00218469808029255
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The viscoelastic and peeling properties of polybutadiene/tackifying resin compatible blends have been studied in detail. Viscoelastic properties have been described through the variations of the complex shear modulus, G*(omega), as a function of frequency, omega, and peeling properties through the variations of peeling force (F) as a function of peeling rate (V). The first paper of this series presented the cohesive fracture domain and the present paper explores the interfacial fracture domain: (i) rubbery interfacial (interfacial i).; (ii) stick-slip; (iii) glassy interfacial (interfacial 2). After a general survey of the properties in the three domains we present a quantitative relationship between the peeling anti linear viscoelastic properties as a function of the adhesive formulation, discussing the use of time-temperature equivalence for adhesive properties. The third part of the paper presents the trumpet model of de Gennes describing the crack shape and propagation: starting from a mechanical analysis of the peeling test, it is shown how one may calculate the variations of the peeling force as a function of peeling rate in the various interfacial fracture domains: this model defines a single interfacial fracture criterion which coexists with the cohesive fracture criterion defined earlier, whatever the fracture location. We present as a conclusion a critical discussion of the relevance and physical meaning of such a criterion and present a new outlook for the modeling and improvement of adhesive formulations.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 228
页数:26
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   FAILURE MECHANISMS IN PEELING OF PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVE TAPE [J].
AUBREY, DW ;
WELDING, GN ;
WONG, T .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE, 1969, 13 (10) :2193-&
[2]   PEEL ADHESION AND VISCOELASTICITY OF RUBBER-RESIN BLENDS [J].
AUBREY, DW ;
SHERRIFF, M .
JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE PART A-POLYMER CHEMISTRY, 1980, 18 (08) :2597-2608
[3]   LINEAR VISCOELASTICITY REVISITED - THE RELAXATION FUNCTION OF MONODISPERSE POLYMER MELTS [J].
BENALLAL, A ;
MARIN, G ;
MONTFORT, JP ;
DERAIL, C .
MACROMOLECULES, 1993, 26 (26) :7229-7235
[4]  
BERNSTEIN B, 1977, J APPL POLYM SCI, V21, P2817
[5]   MELT VISCOSITY MOLECULAR-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIP FOR LINEAR-POLYMERS [J].
COLBY, RH ;
FETTERS, LJ ;
GRAESSLEY, WW .
MACROMOLECULES, 1987, 20 (09) :2226-2237
[6]  
DEGENNES PG, 1988, CR ACAD SCI II, V307, P1949
[7]   Relationship between viscoelastic and peeling properties of model adhesives. Part 1. Cohesive fracture [J].
Derail, C ;
Allal, A ;
Marin, G ;
Tordjeman, P .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 1997, 61 (1-4) :123-+
[8]  
DERAIL C, 1995, THESIS U PAU
[9]  
DERAIL C, 1995, VIDE, P168
[10]  
Ferry JD, 1970, Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers