Assessment of the time-tradeoff values for prophylactic mastectomy of women with a suspected genetic predisposition to breast cancer

被引:30
作者
Unic, I
Stalmeier, PFM
Verhoef, LCG
Van Daal, WAJ
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Hosp, Inst Radiotherapy, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Nijmegen Inst Cognit & Informat, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Arnhem Inst Radiotherapy, Arnhem, Netherlands
关键词
shared decision making; breast cancer; prophylactic mastectomy; preference assessment; time tradeoff; genetic predisposition;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X9801800303
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Female carriers of the breast-cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are at high risk for breast cancer (85%). They face the choice between prophylactic mastectomy (PM) and breast cancer screening. For this treatment choice, a shared-decision-making program was developed. In this program, the time tradeoff (TTO) was used to assess preferences for PM. Purpose. Assessment of the feasibility, constant proportional tradeoff, and reliability of using the TTO for this purpose. Methods. Fifty-four women suspected to carry the BRCA1/2 mutation were provided with comprehensive relevant information. Their preferences for PM were assessed on two occasions. Discrepancies between preferences indicated by the two tests were resolved by testing a third time. The preferences assessed on the last occasion were used for individual decision analyses. In order to test constant proportional tradeoff, the TTO consisted of four items with different numbers of life years. Results. Forty-two women (78%) completed the TTO twice and nine women (17%) performed the test a third time. Three women (5%) completed the TTO only once. The mean TTO value for PM at the last replication was 0.69 (SD = 0.30). Violations of constant proportional tradeoff were significant: the largest tradeoffs were recorded for the shortest durations. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the TTO values for the two last sessions was 0.96. Conclusion. Assessment of individual preferences by the TTO in this patient group is feasible and reliable. Therefore, the TTO can be used in clinical settings to elicit treatment preferences of women proven or suspected to have a genetic predisposition to breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 277
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   THE TIME TRADE-OFF TECHNIQUE - HOW DO THE VALUATIONS OF BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS COMPARE TO THOSE OF OTHER GROUPS [J].
ASHBY, J ;
OHANLON, M ;
BUXTON, MJ .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1994, 3 (04) :257-265
[2]   COMPARISON OF THE RATING-SCALE AND THE STANDARD GAMBLE IN MEASURING PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR OUTCOMES OF GALLSTONE DISEASE [J].
BASS, EB ;
STEINBERG, EP ;
PITT, HA ;
GRIFFITHS, RI ;
LILLEMOE, KD ;
SABA, GP ;
JOHNS, C .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1994, 14 (04) :307-314
[3]   THE WOMAN AT INCREASED RISK FOR BREAST-CANCER - EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES [J].
BILIMORIA, MM ;
MORROW, M .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1995, 45 (05) :263-278
[4]   The validity of QALYs: An experimental test of constant proportional tradeoff and utility independence [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Johannesson, M .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1997, 17 (01) :21-32
[5]   Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer .2. BRCA1 and BRCA2 [J].
Burke, W ;
Daly, M ;
Garber, J ;
Botkin, J ;
Kahn, MJE ;
Lynch, P ;
McTierman, A ;
Offit, K ;
Perlman, J ;
Petersen, G ;
Thomson, E ;
Varricchio, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (12) :997-1003
[6]  
CHURCHILL DN, 1987, CLIN INVEST MED, V10, P14
[7]  
EASTON DF, 1995, AM J HUM GENET, V56, P265
[8]  
EASTON DF, 1993, AM J HUM GENET, V52, P678
[9]   RISKS OF CANCER IN BRCA1-MUTATION CARRIERS [J].
FORD, D ;
EASTON, DF ;
BISHOP, DT ;
NAROD, SA ;
GOLDGAR, DE ;
HAITES, N ;
MILNER, B ;
ALLAN, L ;
PONDER, BAJ ;
PETO, J ;
SMITH, S ;
STRATTON, M ;
LENOIR, GM ;
FEUNTEUN, J ;
LYNCH, H ;
ARASON, A ;
BARKARDOTTIR, R ;
EGILSSON, V ;
BLACK, DM ;
KELSELL, D ;
SPURR, N ;
DEVILEE, P ;
CORNELISSE, CJ ;
VARSEN, H ;
BIRCH, JM ;
SKOLNICK, M ;
SANTIBANEZKOREF, MS ;
TEARE, D ;
STEEL, M ;
PORTER, D ;
COHEN, BB ;
CAROTHERS, A ;
SMYTH, E ;
WEBER, B ;
NEWBOLD, B ;
BOEHNKE, M ;
COLLINS, FS ;
CANNONALBRIGHT, LA ;
GOLDGAR, D .
LANCET, 1994, 343 (8899) :692-695
[10]   METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING HEALTH-STATE PREFERENCES .2. SCALING METHODS [J].
FROBERG, DG ;
KANE, RL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 42 (05) :459-471