A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum

被引：36

作者：

Baskerville, Richard ^{[1
]}

Lyytinen, Kalle ^{[2
]}

Sambamurthy, Vallabh ^{[3
]}

Straub, Detmar ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Georgia State Univ, J Mack Robinson Coll Business, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA

[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Weatherhead Sch Management, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA

[3] Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Coll Business, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA

来源：

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 2011年 / 20卷 / 01期

基金：

美国国家科学基金会;

关键词：

design science research; design research; research methods;

D O I：

10.1057/ejis.2010.56

中图分类号：

TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];

学科分类号：

0812 ;

摘要：

In response to Osterle et al.'s 'Memorandum on Design Oriented Information Systems Research', this commentary disputes, and expands the context of, several premises used to justify the main argument in the memorandum. These include: (1) claims about the evolution and role of design science research in the broader IS community and its position in the so-called 'Anglo-Saxon community', (2) the journal reviewing standards applied to design science research and what is perceived to be a sole focus on behavioral 'descriptive' research in certain IS journals. This commentary also discusses how such journals operate and set up their missions, review principles, a id standards. European Journal of Information Systems (2011) 20, 11-15. doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.56; published online 7 December 2010

引用

页码：11 / 15

页数：5

共 10 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1961, STRUCTURE SCI PROBLE

[2]

Dennis AR, 2006, MIS QUART, V30, P1

[3] The anatomy of a design theory [J].