Short-term antibacterial activity of root canal sealers towards Enterococcus faecalis

被引:84
作者
Kayaoglu, G
Erten, H
Alaçam, T
Orstavik, D
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Endodont & Conservat Treatment, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey
[2] NIOM, Scandinavian Inst Dent Mat, Haslum, Norway
关键词
antimicrobial activity; Enterococcus faecalis; filter membrane; filter paper; root canal sealers;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00981.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim To investigate the antimicrobial activity of root canal sealers on Enterococcus faecalis, either allowing or avoiding direct contact between sealers and bacteria. Methodology Filter paper discs were immersed in standardized E. faecalis suspensions and exposed to freshly mixed sealers (MCS, AH Plus, Grossman's sealer, Sealapex, Apexit) in teflon wells for 30 min, with or without a filter membrane placed between filter paper discs and sealers (membrane-restricted contact test and direct contact test, respectively). After exposure, the filter paper discs were transferred to vials containing phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and glass beads, and vigorously vortexed. PBS with resuspended bacterial cells was serially diluted and 25 mu L droplets were seeded on TSA plates. The plates were incubated in air at 37 degrees C for 24 h and colony-forming units were counted. Using alpha = 0.05 as level for statistical significance, the data obtained were analysed using Student's t-test. Results In the direct contact test, MCS and AH Plus killed the bacteria to a level below the detection limit. They were followed in decreasing order of efficacy by Grossman's sealer, Sealapex and Apexit. In the membrane-restricted contact test, the sealers ranked: MCS, AH Plus, Grossman's sealer, Apexit and Sealapex, in descending order of antibacterial potency. MCS, AH Plus and Grossman's sealer significantly reduced the number of viable bacteria in both tests. Sealapex and Apexit were not statistically different from control. Conclusions MCS, AH Plus and Grossman's sealer were effective in reducing the number of cultivable cells of E. faecalis. Calcium hydroxide-based sealers, Sealapex and Apexit were ineffective in this short-term experiment.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 488
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   The antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers to anaerobic bacteria [J].
Abdulkader, A ;
Duguid, R ;
Saunders, EM .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1996, 29 (04) :280-283
[2]   THE ANTIMICROBIAL EFFECT OF VARIOUS ENDODONTIC SEALERS [J].
ALKHATIB, ZZ ;
BAUM, RH ;
MORSE, DR ;
YESILSOY, C ;
BHAMBHANI, S ;
FURST, ML .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1990, 70 (06) :784-790
[3]   PREDOMINANT OBLIGATE ANAEROBES INVADING THE DEEP LAYERS OF ROOT-CANAL DENTIN [J].
ANDO, N ;
HOSHINO, E .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 1990, 23 (01) :20-27
[4]   INDIRECT LONGITUDINAL CYTOTOXICITY OF ROOT-CANAL SEALERS ON L929 CELLS AND HUMAN PERIODONTAL-LIGAMENT FIBROBLASTS [J].
ARAKI, K ;
SUDA, H ;
SPANGBERG, LSW .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1994, 20 (02) :67-70
[5]  
BYSTROM A, 1985, Endodontics and Dental Traumatology, V1, P170
[6]   Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers after root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide [J].
Çalt, S ;
Serper, A .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1999, 25 (06) :431-433
[7]   In vitro antibacterial activities of root-canal sealers by using two different methods [J].
Çobankara, FK ;
Altinöz, HC ;
Erganis, O ;
Kav, K ;
Belli, S .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2004, 30 (01) :57-60
[8]  
Cohen B I, 1998, Oral Health, V88, P37
[9]   Mechanisms involved in the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide [J].
Evans, M ;
Davies, JK ;
Sundqvist, G ;
Figdor, D .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2002, 35 (03) :221-228
[10]   Comparison of the bile salts and sodium dodecyl sulfate stress responses in Enterococcus faecalis [J].
Flahaut, S ;
Frere, J ;
Boutibonnes, P ;
Auffray, Y .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 62 (07) :2416-2420