Pretransplant donor-specific antibodies in cytotoxic negative crossmatch kidney transplants: Are they relevant?

被引:112
作者
Gupta, Arun [1 ]
Iveson, Victoria [1 ]
Varagunam, Mira [2 ]
Bodger, Stephen [1 ]
Sinnott, Paul [1 ]
Thuraisingham, Raj C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Barts & London NHS Trust, Clin Transplantat Lab, London E1 1BB, England
[2] Barts & London NHS Trust, Dept Nephrol & Transplantat, London E1 1BB, England
关键词
antibodies; kidney; crossmatch; outcomes;
D O I
10.1097/TP.0b013e31816b1c37
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. The corresponding antigens of alloantibodies identified in patients awaiting kidney transplantation are often listed as unacceptable for transplantation. The use of solid phase testing, being more sensitive and accurate than conventional complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assays, has resulted in increased identification of alloantibodies. We aimed to study the clinical importance of alloantibodies defined solely by solid phase techniques. Methods. All patients transplanted between 1999 and 2001 at our center with available day-of-transplant sera (DO) were included (121 patients). All had negative CDC crossmatches. Results. Thirty-eight patients (3 1 %) had detectable alloantibodies using high-definition assays with 16 having donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and 22 non-DSA. There were no cases of hyperacute rejection in any of the groups. Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates in the DSA and non-DSA were similar to the unsensitized group. Delayed graft function and 1-year graft survival rates were also similar for the three groups as were median I-year serum creatinine levels. Multivariate analysis, however, showed that DSA were associated with an increased relative risk of longer-term graft failure (relative risk, 6.5; P < 0.05). Conclusions. These data show that in the context of a CDC-negative crossmatch, the presence of DO DSA has little impact on any early graft parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:1200 / 1204
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Transplanting the highly sensitized patient: The emory algorithm [J].
Bray, R. A. ;
Nolen, J. D. L. ;
Larsen, C. ;
Pearson, T. ;
Newell, K. A. ;
Kokko, K. ;
Guasch, A. ;
Tso, P. ;
Mendel, J. B. ;
Gebel, H. M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (10) :2307-2315
[2]  
Duquesnoy RJ, 2003, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V127, P149
[3]  
Grigsby SJ, 2005, HUM IMMUNOL, V66, pS88
[4]   ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOASSAY FOR ANTI-HLA ANTIBODIES - AN ALTERNATIVE TO PANEL STUDIES BY LYMPHOCYTOTOXICITY [J].
KAO, KJ ;
SCORNIK, JC ;
SMALL, SJ .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1993, 55 (01) :192-196
[5]   Extremely high association between appearance of HLA antibodies and failure of kidney grafts in a five-year longitudinal study [J].
Mao, Q. ;
Terasaki, P. I. ;
Cai, J. ;
Briley, K. ;
Catrou, P. ;
Haisch, C. ;
Rebellato, L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (04) :864-871
[6]   Waiting time on dialysis as the strongest modifiable risk factor for renal transplant outcomes - A paired donor kidney analysis [J].
Meier-Kriesche, HU ;
Kaplan, B .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (10) :1377-1381
[7]  
Nishikawa K, 2001, Clin Transpl, P247
[8]   SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE CROSSMATCH TEST IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION [J].
PATEL, R ;
TERASAKI, PI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1969, 280 (14) :735-&
[9]   Clinical significance of MHC-reactive alloantibodies that develop after kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation [J].
Pelletier, RP ;
Hennessy, PK ;
Adams, PW ;
VanBuskirk, AM ;
Ferguson, RM ;
Orosz, CG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 2 (02) :134-141
[10]   Antibody-mediated rejection in renal allografts: Lessons from pathology [J].
Racusen, Lorraine C. ;
Haas, Mark .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 1 (03) :415-420