Effect of the accuracy of spatial rainfall information on the modeling of water, sediment, and NO3-N loads at the watershed level

被引:73
作者
Chaplot, V
Saleh, A
Jaynes, DB
机构
[1] IRD, Ctr IRD Ile France, F-93143 Bondy, France
[2] Tarleton State Univ, TIAER, Stephenville, TX USA
[3] USDA ARS, Natl Soil Tilth Lab, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
hydrologic modeling; SWAT; spatial input data; rainfall;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.02.019
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In a given watershed, the accuracy of models in predicting the hydrologic and erosion behavior depends, to a large extent, on the quality of the knowledge in respect of the spatial rainfall. The hydrologic and erosion aspects of rainfall are often discussed without due regard to any resulting improvement in watershed modeling. Thus, there is a real need for streamlining raingauge networks in order to reflect rainfall variability and its effect on the prediction of water, sediment and nutrient fluxes at the watershed scale. In this study, such an impact was analyzed using 9-year data collected at the outlets of two watersheds encompassing a range of climates, surface areas and environmental conditions. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was applied using as input data that collected from 1 to 15 precipitation gauges per watershed. At both sites the highest densities of raingauges were used for SWAT calibration. The differences between the highest gauge concentration and lower concentrations used for the estimation of sediment loads led to the conclusion that a high gauge concentration is necessary. At both watersheds, predictions using rainfall records from the national service stations produced inaccurate estimations. This was probably because the gauge concentration was too sparse. Finally, the general applicability of these results is proposed by displaying the possibilities of extrapolation to other watersheds or models. 0 2005 Elsevier B.V.. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 234
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Impact of imperfect rainfall knowledge on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models [J].
Andréassian, V ;
Perrin, C ;
Michel, C ;
Usart-Sanchez, I ;
Lavabre, J .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 250 (1-4) :206-223
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1972, NAT ENG HDB
[3]  
Beven K.J., 1979, Hydrol. Sci. Bull, V24, P43, DOI 10.1080/02626667909491834
[4]  
BLOSCHL G, 1995, HYDROL PROCESS, V9, P251, DOI 10.1002/hyp.3360090305
[5]   RESPONSE OF A DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED EROSION MODEL TO VARIATIONS IN INPUT DATA AGGREGATION LEVELS [J].
BROWN, DG ;
BIAN, L ;
WALSH, SJ .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 1993, 19 (04) :499-509
[6]   Predicting water, sediment and NO3-N loads under scenarios of land-use and management practices in a flat watershed [J].
Chaplot, V ;
Saleh, A ;
Jaynes, DB ;
Arnold, J .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2004, 154 (1-4) :271-293
[7]   THE EFFECT OF GAUGE SAMPLING DENSITY ON THE ACCURACY OF STREAMFLOW PREDICTION FOR RURAL CATCHMENTS [J].
DUNCAN, MR ;
AUSTIN, B ;
FABRY, F ;
AUSTIN, GL .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1993, 142 (1-4) :445-476
[8]  
*EPA, 2000, EPA823R98006
[9]   IMPACT OF SMALL-SCALE SPATIAL RAINFALL VARIABILITY ON RUNOFF MODELING [J].
FAURES, JM ;
GOODRICH, DC ;
WOOLHISER, DA ;
SOROOSHIAN, S .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1995, 173 (1-4) :309-326
[10]   Water quality in Walnut Creek watershed: Setting and farming practices [J].
Hatfield, JL ;
Jaynes, DB ;
Burkart, MR ;
Cambardella, CA ;
Moorman, TB ;
Prueger, JH ;
Smith, MA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1999, 28 (01) :11-24