Trends in the diabetes quality improvement project measures in Maine from 1994 to 1999

被引:25
作者
McClain, MR
Wennberg, DE
Sherwin, RW
Steinmann, WC
Rice, JC
机构
[1] Maine Med Assessment Fdn, Manchester, ME USA
[2] Maine Med Ctr, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, Portland, ME 04102 USA
[3] Tulane Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Grad Sch, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[4] Tulane Univ, Med Ctr, Tulane Ctr Clin Effectiveness & Prevent, New Orleans, LA USA
[5] Tulane Univ, Dept Biostat, Grad Sch, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.26.3.597
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - To examine changes in the management of patients with diabetes from 1994 to 1999 using the claims-based Diabetes Quality Improvement Project (DQIP) accountability measures. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Administrative claims from an employer-based health insurance cohort in Maine were used to describe the prevalence of claims-based DQIP accountability measures-HbA(1c) testing, dilated eye examination, lipid profile, and monitoring for diabetic nephropathy-from 1994 (n = 1,151) to 1999 (n = 2,221) in a 100% sample of adults (18-64 years of age) with diabetes. The Mantel-Haenszel chi(2) test for trend was performed on each measure. Prevalence estimates were also stratified by three insurance products: health maintenance organization (HMO), point of service, and indemnity RESULTS - There was a Positive trend for all outcome measures (P < 0.001). The baseline and final frequencies (percent increase) for lipid testing, HbA(1c), dilated eye examination, and screening for diabetic nephropathywere as follows. 13-50% (257%), 37-69% (92%), 30-46% (53%), and 37-50% (36%), respectively. Individuals with diabetes and indemnity insurance were much less likely to receive these measures than individuals with other types of insurance, whereas people in HMOs were more likely to receive HbA(1c) testing and lipid profiles. CONCLUSIONS - The proportion of patients with diabetes receiving DQIP accountability measures significantly increased from 1994 to 1999. There is large variation in prevalence among these measures and insurance products. It is urgent to identify effective mechanisms for delivering consistent preventive care that are congruent with defined standards of benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 601
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Applying the Diabetes Quality Improvement Project Indicators in the Indian Health Service primary care setting [J].
Acton, KJ ;
Shields, R ;
Rith-Najarian, S ;
Tolbert, B ;
Kelly, J ;
Moore, K ;
Valdez, L ;
Skipper, B ;
Gohdes, D .
DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (01) :22-26
[2]  
Amer Diabet Assoc, 2000, DIABETES CARE, V23, pS32
[3]   Population-based assessment of the level of care among adults with diabetes in the US [J].
Beckles, GLA ;
Engelgau, MM ;
Narayan, KMV ;
Herman, WH ;
Aubert, RE ;
Williamson, DF .
DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (09) :1432-1438
[4]  
*BEH RISK FACT SUR, 1997, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V46, P1018
[5]  
*BEH RISK FACT SUR, 1997, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V46, P1023
[6]   Quality of diabetes care among low-income patients in North Carolina [J].
Bell, RA ;
Camacho, F ;
Goonan, K ;
Duren-Winfield, V ;
Anderson, RT ;
Konen, JC ;
Goff, DC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 21 (02) :124-131
[7]   Tracking clinical preventive service use - A comparison of the health plan employer data and information set with the behavioral risk factor surveillance system [J].
Bloom, SA ;
Harris, JR ;
Thompson, BL ;
Ahmed, F ;
Thompson, J .
MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (02) :187-194
[8]  
*CDCP, 2000, HLTH PEOPL 2010 NAT
[9]  
*CDCP, 1990, HLTH PEOPL 2000 NAT
[10]  
*CDCP, 1998, NAT DIAB FACT SHEET