Will international emissions trading help achieve the objectives of the Paris Agreement?

被引:63
作者
Fujimori, Shinichiro [1 ,2 ]
Kubota, Izumi [1 ]
Dai, Hancheng [1 ]
Takahashi, Kiyoshi [1 ]
Hasegawa, Tomoko [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Jing-Yu [1 ]
Hijioka, Yasuaki [1 ]
Masui, Toshihiko [1 ]
Takimi, Maho [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Environm Studies, Ctr Social & Environm Syst Res, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[2] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Schlosspl 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria
[3] Mizuho Informat & Res Inst Inc, Chiyoda Ku, 2-3 Kanda Nishikicho, Tokyo 1018443, Japan
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2016年 / 11卷 / 10期
关键词
emissions trading; Paris Agreement; computable general equilibrium model; welfare change; ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; CLIMATE POLICY;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/104001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the Paris Agreement, parties set and implement their own emissions targets as nationally determined contributions (NDCs) to tackle climate change. International carbon emissions trading is expected to reduce global mitigation costs. Here, we show the benefit of emissions trading under both NDCs and a more ambitious reduction scenario consistent with the 2 degrees Cgoal. The results show that the global welfare loss, which was measured based on estimated household consumption change in 2030, decreased by 75% (from 0.47% to 0.16%), as a consequence of achieving NDCs through emissions trading. Furthermore, achieving the 2 degrees Ctargets without emissions trading led to a global welfare loss of 1.4%-3.4%, depending on the burden-sharing scheme used, whereas emissions trading reduced the loss to around 1.5% (from 1.4% to 1.7%). These results indicate that emissions trading is a valuable option for the international system, enabling NDCs and more ambitious targets to be achieved in a cost-effective manner.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], INDC COUNTER AGGREGA
  • [2] [Anonymous], APPL ENERGY
  • [3] [Anonymous], IAMC AR5 SCEN DAT
  • [4] [Anonymous], TRACK INDCS
  • [5] [Anonymous], ASSESSMENT IMPLICATI
  • [6] [Anonymous], EM DAT GLOB ATM RES
  • [7] [Anonymous], COSTS KYOTO PROTOCOL
  • [8] [Anonymous], DISCUSSION PAPER SER
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2013, FAOSTAT
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2015, C PARTIES 21 SESS