Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally-invasive colorectal practice

被引:47
作者
Hassan, Imran [1 ,2 ]
You, Y. Nancy [1 ]
Cima, Robert R. [1 ]
Larson, David W. [1 ]
Dozois, Eric J. [1 ]
Barnes, S. A. [3 ]
Pemberton, John H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Colon & Rectal Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] So Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Div Gen Surg, Springfield, IL 62794 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Biostat Sect, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2008年 / 22卷 / 03期
关键词
colorectal cancer; clinical papers; instrumental technics; bowel;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-007-9477-4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Laparoscopic assisted (LA) colectomy has significant patient benefits but is technically challenging. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) allows tactile feedback because the surgeon's hand assists in retraction and dissection. This may decrease the technical difficulty and shorten the learning curve associated with performing laparoscopic colectomy. We investigated the patient selection and short-term clinical outcomes of HALS and LA since the introduction of HALS to our minimally invasive colorectal practice. Methods Prospectively collected data on 258 patients undergoing HALS (n = 109) or LA colectomy (n = 149) during a calendar year (2004) were analyzed. Patient and disease characteristics, operative parameters, and perioperative outcomes were compared. Results HALS patients were similar to LA patients in age (51 vs. 54 yrs), gender (56 vs. 52% male), body mass index (26 vs. 26 kg/m2), comorbidities (84 vs. 85% with one or more), and diagnosis (83 vs. 80% benign), but differed in incidence of previous surgery (49 vs. 30%; P = 0.008). A significantly greater proportion of HALS patients underwent complex procedures and extensive resections. Conversion rates (15 vs. 11%, P = 0.44), intraoperative complications (4 vs. 1%, P = 0.17), 30-day morbidity (18 vs. 11%, P = 0.12) and surgical reinterventions (2 vs. 1%, P = 0.58) did not differ. Recovery measured by days to flatus was not different [mean (standard deviation) 3(2) vs. 3(2) days, P = 0.26], however HALS patients had longer operative times [276(96) vs. 211(107) minutes P < 0.0001] and 1 day longer stay in hospital [6(3) vs. 5 (3) days, P = 0.0009)]. Conclusions Patients undergoing HALS underwent more-complex procedures than LA patients but retained the short-term benefits associated with LA colectomy. HALS facilitates expansion of a minimally invasive colectomy practice to include more challenging procedures while maintaining short-term patient benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:739 / 743
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: Evolution to a clinically useful technique [J].
Ballantyne, GH ;
Leahy, PF .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2004, 47 (05) :753-765
[2]   Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy - Helping hand or hindrance? [J].
Chang, YJ ;
Marcello, PW ;
Rusin, LC ;
Roberts, PL ;
Schoetz, DJ .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (05) :656-661
[3]   Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery [J].
Darzi, A .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2000, 14 (11) :999-1004
[4]   Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index &lt;30?: A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy [J].
Delaney, CP ;
Pokala, N ;
Senagore, AJ ;
Casillas, S ;
Kiran, RP ;
Brady, KM ;
Fazio, VW .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (05) :975-981
[5]   Ileorectal anastomosis for slow transit constipation: Long-term functional and quality of life results [J].
Hassan, Imran ;
Pemberton, John H. ;
Young-Fadok, Tonia M. ;
You, Y. Nancy ;
Drelichman, Ernesto R. ;
Rath-Harvey, Doris ;
Schleck, Cathy D. ;
Larson, Dirk R. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (10) :1330-1336
[6]   The learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a single surgeon's experience [J].
Kang, J. -C. ;
Jao, S. -W. ;
Chung, M. H. ;
Feng, C. -C. ;
Chang, Y. J. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (02) :234-237
[7]   Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study [J].
Kang, JC ;
Chung, MH ;
Chao, PC ;
Yeh, CC ;
Hsiao, CW ;
Lee, TY ;
Jao, SW .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (04) :577-581
[8]   Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery - An emerging technique [J].
Kurian, MS ;
Patterson, E ;
Andrei, VE ;
Edye, MB .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (11) :1277-1281
[9]   Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic illeal-pouch-anal anastomosis - A single institutional case-matched experience [J].
Larson, DW ;
Cima, RR ;
Dozois, EJ ;
Davies, M ;
Piotrowicz, K ;
Barnes, SA ;
Wolff, B ;
Pemberton, J .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 243 (05) :667-672
[10]   Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis:: Functional outcome in a case-matched series [J].
Larson, DW ;
Dozois, EJ ;
Piotrowicz, K ;
Cima, RR ;
Wolff, BG ;
Young-Fadok, TM .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (10) :1845-1850