Decision templates for multiple classifier fusion: an experimental comparison

被引:717
作者
Kuncheva, LI [1 ]
Bezdek, JC
Duin, RPW
机构
[1] Univ Wales, Sch Math, Bangor LL57 1UT, Gwynedd, Wales
[2] Univ W Florida, Dept Comp Sci, Pensacola, FL 32514 USA
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Sci Appl, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
classifier fusion; combination of multiple classifiers; decision templates; fuzzy similarity; behavior-knowledge-space; fuzzy integral; Dempster-Shafer; class-conscious fusion; class-indifferent fusion;
D O I
10.1016/S0031-3203(99)00223-X
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Multiple classifier fusion may generate more accurate classification than each of the constituent classifiers. Fusion is often based on fixed combination rules like the product and average. Only under strict probabilistic conditions can these rules be justified. We present here a simple rule for adapting the class combiner to the application. c decision templates (one per class) are estimated with the same training set that is used for the set of classifiers. These templates are then matched to the decision profile of new incoming objects by some similarity measure. We compare 11 versions of our model with 14 other techniques for classifier fusion on the Satimage and Phoneme datasets from the database ELENA. Our results show that decision templates based on integral type measures of similarity are superior to the other schemes on both data sets. (C) 2000 Pattern Recognition Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 314
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Local linear perceptrons for classification [J].
Alpaydin, E ;
Jordan, MI .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1996, 7 (03) :788-792
[2]  
Anderson J.A., 1982, Handbook of Statistics, V2, P169
[3]   DEMOCRACY IN NEURAL NETS - VOTING SCHEMES FOR CLASSIFICATION [J].
BATTITI, R ;
COLLA, AM .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 1994, 7 (04) :691-707
[4]   Multistage classifiers optimized by neural networks and genetic algorithms [J].
Benediktsson, JA ;
Sveinsson, JR ;
Ingimundarson, JI ;
Sigurdsson, HS ;
Ersoy, OK .
NONLINEAR ANALYSIS-THEORY METHODS & APPLICATIONS, 1997, 30 (03) :1323-1334
[5]   CONSENSUS THEORETIC CLASSIFICATION METHODS [J].
BENEDIKTSSON, JA ;
SWAIN, PH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1992, 22 (04) :688-704
[6]  
BEZDEK JC, 1999, IN PRESS FUZZY MODEL
[7]  
Bishop C. M., 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT
[8]   Information combination operators for data fusion: A comparative review with classification [J].
Bloch, I .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 1996, 26 (01) :52-67
[9]   A MULTIPLICATIVE FORMULA FOR AGGREGATING PROBABILITY ASSESSMENTS [J].
BORDLEY, RF .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1982, 28 (10) :1137-1148
[10]  
CHIANG C, 1994, INT JOINT C NEUR NET, P119