Performance Measurement in the Public Sector in England: Searching for the Golden Thread

被引:66
作者
Micheli, Pietro [1 ]
Neely, Andy [1 ]
机构
[1] Cranfield Sch Management, Ctr Business Performance, Cranfield MK43 0AL, Beds, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
GOVERNMENT; MANAGEMENT; STATE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02180.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Despite the significant volume of studies on public sector performance measurement, a paucity of empirical research describes in detail the systems and processes used at different levels of government to measure and manage performance. This study focuses on the experience of Public Service Agreements in the public sector in England. In particular, the impact of a centralized, performance measurement-driven approach on public service delivery is analyzed using case studies in a health care and a police organization. Despite efforts to introduce a "golden thread" to link different levels of the public sector hierarchy, in both cases, there was relatively low consistency in terms of performance indicators, targets, and priorities. Significant implications are evident for the design and role of performance targets and indicators, for the possibility to align frameworks at different levels of the public sector, and for the importance of feedback loops in measurement systems.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 600
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NEW PERFORMANCE CHAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], PERF IND GOOD BAD UG
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, CASE STUDY RES DESIG
[4]   Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures [J].
Behn, RD .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2003, 63 (05) :586-606
[5]   What's measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system [J].
Bevan, Gwyn ;
Hood, Christopher .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2006, 84 (03) :517-538
[6]   Federal Government Reform: Lessons from Clinton's "Reinventing Government" and Bush's "Management Agenda" Initiatives [J].
Breul, Jonathan D. ;
Kamensky, John M. .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2008, 68 (06) :1009-1026
[7]  
Brignall S., 2000, Manag. Account. Res., V11, P281, DOI [10.1006/mare.2000.0136, DOI 10.1006/MARE.2000.0136]
[8]  
Butterfield R., 2004, Public Management Review, V6, P395, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1471903042000256556, 10.1080/1471903042000256556]
[9]   GAAP AS A SYMBOL OF LEGITIMACY - NEW-YORK STATES DECISION TO ADOPT GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES [J].
CARPENTER, VL ;
FEROZ, EH .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1992, 17 (07) :613-643
[10]  
Carter N., 1992, ORG MEASURE SUCCESS