Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Appendicitis in Adults: A Meta-Analysis

被引:36
作者
Barger, Richard L., Jr. [1 ]
Nandalur, Kiran R. [1 ]
机构
[1] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Radiol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
关键词
Acute appendicitis; meta-analysis; SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS; PREGNANT-WOMEN; US; PAIN; MRI; CT; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2010.05.003
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: Perform a meta-analysis evaluating the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were queried between January 1995 and December 2009. Prospective and retrospective studies were included if they: used MRI as a diagnostic test for appendicitis, used pathology or clinical follow-up as the reference standard, and reported absolute number of true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative results, or stated sufficient data to derive these values. Summary sensitivity, summary specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+) and (LR-), and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated. Heterogeneity of the results was assessed using Forest plots and the value of inconsistency index (I-2). Results: The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by eight articles with a total of 363 patients (mean age 26.9 +/- 7.2 years; 86.2 % female). The appendix was not found in eight patients, with one article not reporting such data. The summary sensitivity was 97% (92%-99% at 95% confidence interval [CI]) and summary specificity was 95% (CI: 94%-99%), with a LR+ of 16.3 (CI: 9.1-29.1) and a LR- of 0.09 (CI: 0.040.197). Diagnostic odds ratio was 299.85 (CI: 97.5-921.61). No heterogeneity was found in the sensitivity (I-2 = 0.0, P = .4589). Minimal heterogeneity was found in the specificity (I-2 = 21.9%, P = .2553). Conclusion: MRI appears promising in the evaluation of acute appendicitis, although larger future studies are warranted to confirm the results.
引用
收藏
页码:1211 / 1216
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   HIGH-RESOLUTION SONOGRAPHY OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS [J].
ABUYOUSEF, MM ;
BLEICHER, JJ ;
MAHER, JW ;
URDANETA, LF ;
FRANKEN, EA ;
METCALF, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 149 (01) :53-58
[2]   THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF APPENDICITIS AND APPENDECTOMY IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
ADDISS, DG ;
SHAFFER, N ;
FOWLER, BS ;
TAUXE, RV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 132 (05) :910-925
[3]   Appendicitis in pregnancy: Diagnosis, management and complications [J].
Andersen, B ;
Nielsen, TF .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 78 (09) :758-762
[4]   MRI of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnant patients [J].
Birchard, KR ;
Brown, MA ;
Hyslop, WB ;
Firat, Z ;
Semelka, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (02) :452-458
[5]   Appendicitis at the millennium [J].
Birnbaum, BA ;
Wilson, SR .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) :337-348
[6]   ACUTE APPENDICITIS - THE RADIOLOGISTS ROLE [J].
BROWN, JJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 180 (01) :13-14
[7]   Abdominal pain during pregnancy [J].
Cappell, MS ;
Friedel, D .
GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 32 (01) :1-+
[8]   MRI for clinically suspected appendicitis during pregnancy [J].
Cobben, LP ;
Groot, I ;
Haans, L ;
Blickman, JG ;
Puylaert, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (03) :671-675
[9]   US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis [J].
Doria, Andrea S. ;
Moineddin, Rahim ;
Kellenberger, Christian J. ;
Epelman, Monica ;
Beyene, Joseph ;
Schuh, Suzanne ;
Babyn, Paul S. ;
Dick, Paul T. .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (01) :83-94
[10]   A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis [J].
Fischer, JE ;
Bachmann, LM ;
Jaeschke, R .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 29 (07) :1043-1051