Optimal designs for estimating the interesting part of a dose-effect curve

被引:42
作者
Miller, Frank [1 ]
Guilbaud, Olivier
Dette, Holger
机构
[1] AstraZeneca, Clin Informat Sci, S-15185 Sodertalje, Sweden
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Fak Math, D-4630 Bochum, Germany
关键词
adaptive design; Bayesian design; clinical trial; dose-finding; optimal design;
D O I
10.1080/10543400701645140
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
We consider a dose-finding trial in phase IIB of drug development. For choosing an appropriate design for this trial the specification of two points is critical: an appropriate model for describing the dose-effect relationship, and the specification of the aims of the trial (objectives), which will be the focus in the present paper. For many situations it is essential to have a robust trial objective that has little risk of changing during the complete trial due to external information. An important and realistic objective of a dose-finding trial is to obtain precise information about key parts of the dose-effect curve. We reflect this goal in a statistical optimality criterion and derive efficient designs using optimal design theory. In particular, we determine nonadaptive Bayesian optimal designs, i.e., designs which are not changed by information obtained from an interim analysis. Compared with a traditional balanced design for this trial, it is shown that the optimal design is substantially more efficient. This implies either a gain in information, or essential savings in sample size. Further, we investigate an adaptive Bayesian optimal design that uses different optimal designs before and after an interim analysis, and we compare the adaptive with the nonadaptive Bayesian optimal design. The basic concept is illustrated using a modi. cation of a recent AstraZeneca trial.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1115
页数:19
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Statistical Methods for Dose-Finding Experiments
[2]  
Atkinson A.C., 1992, OPTIMUM EXPT DESIGNS
[3]   DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS FOR THE PRECISE ESTIMATION OF DOSE-RESPONSE PARAMETERS - THE HILL EQUATION [J].
BEZEAU, M ;
ENDRENYI, L .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1986, 123 (04) :415-430
[4]   Combining multiple comparisons and modeling techniques in dose-response studies [J].
Bretz, F ;
Pinheiro, JC ;
Branson, M .
BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (03) :738-748
[5]  
Committee for Medical Products for Human Use (CHMP), 2006, REFL PAP METH ISS CO
[6]   Optimal design for goodness-of-fit of the Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetic function [J].
Dette, H ;
Melas, VB ;
Wong, WK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 100 (472) :1370-1381
[7]   Bayesian and maximin optimal designs for heteroscedastic regression models [J].
Dette, H ;
Haines, LM ;
Imhof, LA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 2005, 33 (02) :221-241
[8]   A comparison of sequential and non-sequential designs for discrimination between nested regression models [J].
Dette, H ;
Kwiecien, R .
BIOMETRIKA, 2004, 91 (01) :165-176
[9]   Optimality criteria for regression models based on predicted variance [J].
Dette, H ;
O'Brien, TE .
BIOMETRIKA, 1999, 86 (01) :93-106
[10]  
DETTE H, 2007, OPTIMAL DESIGNS DOSE