The Andalusia Epilepsy Society's Guide to Epilepsy Therapy 2005:: II.: Chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs in adults and in children

被引:3
作者
Sánchez-Alvarez, JC
Galán-Barranco, JM
Camino-León, R
Pita-Calandre, E
Ramos-Lizana, J
Moreno-Alegre, V
Rufo-Campos, M
Mercadé-Cerdá, JM
Casado-Chocán, JL
Altuzarra-Corral, A
Serrano-Castro, PJ
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Virgen Nieves, Serv Neurol, E-18013 Granada, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Virgen Nieves, Serv Neurocirugia, E-18013 Granada, Spain
[3] Hosp Valme, Serv Neurol, Seville, Spain
[4] Hosp Univ Reina Sofia, Serv Neuropediat, Cordoba, Spain
[5] Univ Granada, Inst Neurociencias, Dept Farmacol Clin, E-18071 Granada, Spain
[6] Hosp Torrecardenas, Unidad Neuropediat, Almeria, Spain
[7] Hosp Torrecardenas, Neurol Serv, Almeria, Spain
[8] Hosp Clin Univ San Cecilio, Serv Neurol, San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
[9] Hosp Univ Virgen Rocio, Serv Neuropediat, Seville, Spain
[10] Hosp Univ Carlos Haya, Serv Neurol, Malaga, Spain
[11] Hosp Juan Ramon Jimenez, Serv Neurol, Huelva, Spain
关键词
adult; antiepileptic drugs; clinical practice guidelines; epilepsy; evidence-based medicine; infancy; new antiepileptic drugs; systematic review; treatment;
D O I
10.33588/rn.4010.2005158
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims. The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. Development. A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology's Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies' criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Conclusions. The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 626
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Arzimanoglou A, 2002, EPILEPTIC DISORD, V4, P217
[2]   Some common issues in the use of antiepileptic drugs [J].
Asconapé, JJ .
SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY, 2002, 22 (01) :27-39
[3]  
Baram TZ, 1996, PEDIATRICS, V97, P375
[4]   Adjunctive therapy versus alternative monotherapy in patients with partial epilepsy failing on a single drug: a multicentre, randomised, pragmatic controlled trial [J].
Beghi, E ;
Gatti, G ;
Tonini, C ;
Ben-Menachem, E ;
Chadwick, DW ;
Nikanorova, M ;
Gromov, SA ;
Smith, PEM ;
Specchio, LM ;
Perucca, E .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2003, 57 (01) :1-13
[5]   Idiopathic generalized epilepsy and choice of antiepileptic drugs [J].
Benbadis, SR ;
Tatum, WO ;
Gieron, M .
NEUROLOGY, 2003, 61 (12) :1793-1795
[6]   Double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of lamotrigine in treatment-resistant generalised epilepsy [J].
Beran, RG ;
Berkovic, SF ;
Dunagan, FM ;
Vajda, FJE ;
Danta, G ;
Black, AB ;
Mackenzie, R .
EPILEPSIA, 1998, 39 (12) :1329-1333
[7]  
Booth F, 1998, EPILEPSIA, V39, P952
[8]  
Brodie M.J., 2002, NEUROLOGY S5, V58, P2
[9]   DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF LAMOTRIGINE AND CARBAMAZEPINE IN NEWLY-DIAGNOSED EPILEPSY [J].
BRODIE, MJ ;
RICHENS, A ;
YUEN, AWC .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8948) :476-479
[10]   Gabapentin versus lamotrigine monotherapy: A double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy [J].
Brodie, MJ ;
Chadwick, TW ;
Anhut, H ;
Otte, A ;
Messmer, SL ;
Maton, S ;
Sauermann, W ;
Murray, G ;
Garofalo, EA .
EPILEPSIA, 2002, 43 (09) :993-1000