Minilaparotomy myomectomy: A minimally invasive alternative for the large fibroid uterus

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of performing myomectomies through 3- to 6-cm incisions for the removal Of myomas LIP to 14 cm in diameter. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of 139 myomectomies performed at our center from January 1995 through December 2003 (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: A suburban medical Center, part of a large prepaid health maintenance organization. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-nine women. INTERVENTIONS: Myomectomies were performed through 3- to 6-cm suprapubic cruciate incisions using atraumatic elastic retractors with or without laparoscopic assist. Myomas were morcellated with a scalpel before being enucleated. The uterus was repaired in a classic three-layered Closure in all cases. All procedures were performed in the ambulatory surgery unit Of Our hospital, which is part of the main operating room. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median age of the patients in this series was 30.0 years (range 23-56 years). The median weight of the myomas removed was 275.0 g (range of 30-975 g). One hundred thirty-seven (98.5%) of 139 patients were discharged in 23 hours or less, with 24 patients leaving within 4 hours and 61 within 8 hours. The median length of stay was 6.0 hours, with two patients remaining hospitalized for 48 hours. The median operating time was 110 minutes (range 44-260 min). Estimated blood loss ranged from 50 to 2000 mL, with a median of 300 mL. Three hysterectomies were performed: one as an emergency for hemorrhage and two for recurrent myomas. Three patients developed Wound seromas, and one developed a Wound infection. CONCLUSIONS: Minilaparotomy myomectomy is a safe, effective minimally invasive alternative to laparoscopic myomectomy. Early discharge and return to normal activities is comparable to laparoscopy and is far more cost effective. It affords the ability to palpate the uterus and close the myometrial defect easily with a standard three-layered closure making it particularly suitable for gynecologists with limited laparoscopic suturing skills. (c) 2005 AAGL. All rights reserved.