Who chooses to carpool and why? Examination of Texas carpoolers

被引:74
作者
Li, Janling [1 ]
Embry, Patrick [1 ]
Mattingly, Stephen P. [2 ]
Sadabadi, Kaveh Farokhi [2 ]
Rasmidatta, Isaradatta [2 ]
Burris, Mark W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Arlington, Sch Urban & Publ Affairs, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[2] Univ Texas Arlington, Sch Urban & Publ Affairs, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77834 USA
关键词
TRAVEL-RELATED STRATEGIES; FRANCISCO BAY AREA; MODE CHOICE; INDIVIDUALS ADAPT; PERSONAL TRAVEL; LAND-USE; EXPLORATION; BEHAVIOR; INCOME; HABIT;
D O I
10.3141/2021-13
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The debate over high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) and high-occupancy toll lane efficiency has raised questions about whether HOVs should be given preferential treatment on managed lanes and the potential impacts of different preferential treatments. This research questions why people choose their mode of travel by examining characteristics of carpoolers and single-occupancy vehicles, reasons for their travel mode choice, and carpool formation, on the basis of a survey of travelers in Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston in Texas. Carpool users rated the ability to use HOV lanes as the most important factor in their decision to form a carpool. Enjoying traveling with others ranked second, followed by reasons such as saving time, helping the environment and society, and sharing vehicle costs. Carpool partner matching programs, employer carpool incentives, and preferred parking at work were generally the least important factors in travelers' consideration of carpooling. The importance of various factors changed significantly if the respondent was on a work or commute trip versus other trip modes. Travelers on work or commute trips ranked travel time savings and cost sharing much higher, as expected, because of their frequent travel during peak hours. The data also support evidence of a significant amount of "fampooling," with nearly 75% of carpools consisting of family members. The implications of these findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 117
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Habit and information use in travel mode choices [J].
Aarts, H ;
Verplanken, B ;
vanKnippenberg, A .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1997, 96 (1-2) :1-14
[2]   Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action [J].
Bamberg, S ;
Ajzen, I ;
Schmidt, P .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 25 (03) :175-187
[3]   The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode choice [J].
Bhat, Chandra R. ;
Sardesai, Rupali .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2006, 40 (09) :709-730
[4]   The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies [J].
Boarnet, M ;
Crane, R .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2001, 35 (09) :823-845
[5]  
Burris M.W., 2006, J TRANSPORTATION RES, V45, P103
[6]   How do individuals adapt their personal travel? Objective and subjective influences on the consideration of travel-related strategies for San Francisco Bay Area commuters [J].
Cao, XY ;
Mokhtarian, PL .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2005, 12 (04) :291-302
[7]   How do individuals adapt their personal travel? A conceptual exploration of the consideration of travel-related strategies [J].
Cao, XY ;
Mokhtarian, PL .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2005, 12 (03) :199-206
[8]   Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American housing survey [J].
Cervero, R .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1996, 30 (05) :361-377
[9]  
CLEMENS J, 2003, VANCOUVER PROVINCE
[10]  
CONNOLLY G, 2005, WASHINGTON POST 0811