Nonlinear Effect of Public Infrastructure on Energy Intensity in China: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach

被引:15
作者
Bi, Chao [1 ]
Jia, Minna [2 ]
Zeng, Jingjing [3 ]
机构
[1] Shaanxi Normal Univ, Int Business Sch, Xian 710119, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Florida State Univ, Inst Sci & Publ Affairs, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[3] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2019年 / 11卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
public infrastructure; energy intensity; nonlinear effect; panel smooth transition regression; NUISANCE PARAMETER; STRUCTURAL-CHANGE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ELECTRICITY DEMAND; DECOMPOSITION; EFFICIENCY; INVESTMENT; INDUSTRIAL; IMPACTS; ELASTICITIES;
D O I
10.3390/su11030629
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Public infrastructure not only promotes economic growth, but also influences energy intensity, which plays an important role in the strategies related to energy. Therefore, infrastructure policy can be used as an important instrument to reconcile the dilemma of energy, economy, and environment in China. However, few studies have been made to assess the effect of public infrastructure on energy intensity in China. This paper presents an analysis of how three typical types of public infrastructure (i.e., transportation, energy, and information infrastructure) affect energy intensity for 30 Chinese provinces, from 2001 to 2016. To account for nonlinearities, we adopt the panel smooth transition regression (PSTR) approach. The results show that transportation infrastructure has a significantly negative effect on energy intensity, and this negative effect gradually strengthens when the transportation infrastructure stock exceeds the threshold value. Adversely, energy infrastructure has a significantly positive effect on energy intensity, and this positive effect gradually strengthens with the development of energy infrastructure. Our results also suggest that the development of information infrastructure could not only strengthen its own significantly negative effect on energy intensity, but also could promote the negative effect of transportation infrastructure on energy intensity. Moreover, the positive impact of energy infrastructure on energy intensity gradually decreases when the stock of information infrastructure surpasses the larger threshold value. Our findings suggest that policy makers could reduce energy intensity by accelerating the development of transportation and information infrastructure. Furthermore, they could strengthen the negative effects of transportation and information infrastructure on energy intensity and weaken energy infrastructure's positive effect on energy intensity by increasing their information infrastructure investment.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Abdolrasoul G., 2015, IRAN ENERGY EC, V3, P169
[2]   OPTIMAL TESTS WHEN A NUISANCE PARAMETER IS PRESENT ONLY UNDER THE ALTERNATIVE [J].
ANDREWS, DWK ;
PLOBERGER, W .
ECONOMETRICA, 1994, 62 (06) :1383-1414
[3]   MULTILEVEL DECOMPOSITION OF INDUSTRIAL ENERGY-CONSUMPTION [J].
ANG, BW .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1995, 17 (01) :39-51
[4]   Is the energy intensity a less useful indicator than the carbon factor in the study of climate change? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 1999, 27 (15) :943-946
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, WORLD DEV REPORT 199
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU8060544
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2002, CHIN STAT YB
[8]  
[Anonymous], J SUSTAIN DEV
[9]   Does infrastructure investment lead to economic growth or economic fragility? Evidence from China [J].
Ansar, Atif ;
Flyvbjerg, Bent ;
Budzier, Alexander ;
Lunn, Daniel .
OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2016, 32 (03) :360-390
[10]   The Impacts of Telecommunications Infrastructure and Institutional Quality on Trade Efficiency in Africa [J].
Bankole, Felix Olu ;
Osei-Bryson, Kweku-Muata ;
Brown, Irwin .
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 21 (01) :29-43