Decent democratic centralism

被引:23
作者
Angle, SC [1 ]
机构
[1] Wesleyan Univ, Mansfield Freeman Ctr Asian Studies, Middletown, CT 06459 USA
关键词
Rawls; The Law of Peoples; democratic centralism; Chinese political theory; decent society; pluralism; global/comparative philosophy;
D O I
10.1177/0090591705276880
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
A re there any coherent and defensible alternatives to liberal democracy? The author examines the possibility that a reformed democratic centralism-the principle around which China's current-polity is officially organized-might be legitimate, according to both an inside and an outside perspective. The inside perspective builds on contemporary Chinese political theory; the outside perspective critically deploys Rawls's notion of a "decent society" as its standard. Along the way, the author pays particular attention to the kinds and degree of pluralism a decent society can countenance, and to the specific institutions in China that might enable the realization of a genuine and/or decent democratic centralism. The author argues that by considering both inside and outside perspectives, and the degrees to which they inter-penetrate and critically inform one another, we can engage in a global philosophy that neither pre-judges alternative political traditions nor falls prey to false conceptual barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 546
页数:29
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
ANGLE SC, 2005, MUST WE CHOOSE LEADE
[2]  
ANGLE SC, IN PRESS DAVIDSONS P
[3]  
Angle StephenC., 2002, HUMAN RIGHTS CHINESE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, RISE POWER CHINESE C
[5]  
[Anonymous], CHINESE DEMOCRACY TI
[6]   Rawls's Law of Peoples [J].
Beitz, CR .
ETHICS, 2000, 110 (04) :669-696
[7]  
Bell Daniel., 1995, Towards Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia
[8]   CONSENSUAL POLITICS IN RURAL CHINESE COMMUNITIES - MASS LINE IN THEORY AND PRACTICE [J].
BLECHER, M .
MODERN CHINA, 1979, 5 (01) :105-126
[9]  
BLECHER M, 1991, CONT CHINESE POLITIC
[10]  
Brown Chris, 2002, SOVEREIGNTY RIGHTS J