Diagnosis and management of a mediastinal leak following radical oesophagectomy

被引:150
作者
Griffin, SM [1 ]
Lamb, PJ [1 ]
Dresner, SM [1 ]
Richardson, DL [1 ]
Hayes, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Victoria Infirm, No Oesophagogastr Canc Unit, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 4LP, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01918.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnosis, management and outcome of mediastinal leaks following radical oesophagectomy with a stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. Methods: Some 291 consecutive patients underwent two-phase subtotal oesophagectomy with gastric interposition for malignancy. Patients with clinical suspicion of a leak were investigated with contrast radiology and flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Results: Nineteen patients (6.5 per cent) developed a proven mediastinal leak at a median of 8 (range 3-30) days following surgery. Contrast radiology and flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscopy identified that 13 patients had an isolated leak from the oesophagogastric anastomosis and two had widespread leakage secondary to gastrotomy-line dehiscence. Endoscopy revealed a further four patients with gastric necrosis in whom contrast radiology was normal. In six patients the diagnosis of leakage followed an apparently normal routine contrast examination on day 5-8. All 13 isolated anastomotic leaks were managed non-operatively with targeted mediastinal drainage, intravenous antibiotics and antifungal therapy, nasogastric decompression and enteral nutrition; the mortality rate was 15 per cent (two of 13). Patients with gastrotomy dehiscence or gastric necrosis had a more severe clinical picture; the), were managed with repeat thoracotomy and either revision of the conduit or resection and exclusion. Despite early intervention four of the six patients died. Conclusion: Routine postoperative contrast radiology cannot be recommended. On clinical suspicion of a leak patients require both contrast radiology and endoscopic evaluation. Isolated anastomotic leaks can be managed successfully with non-operative treatment, whereas more extensive leaks from the gastric conduit require revisional surgery which carries a high mortality rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1346 / 1351
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Craig SR, 1996, J ROY COLL SURG EDIN, V41, P17
[2]  
Griffin SM, 1997, UPPER GASTROINTESTIN, P111
[3]   Factors affecting morbidity, mortality, and survival in patients undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy [J].
Karl, RC ;
Schreiber, R ;
Boulware, D ;
Baker, S ;
Coppola, D .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (05) :635-641
[4]  
LAM TCF, 1992, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V104, P395
[5]   EARLY ENTERAL FEEDING, COMPARED WITH PARENTERAL, REDUCES POSTOPERATIVE SEPTIC COMPLICATIONS - THE RESULTS OF A METAANALYSIS [J].
MOORE, FA ;
FELICIANO, DV ;
ANDRASSY, RJ ;
MCARDLE, AH ;
BOOTH, FVM ;
MORGENSTEINWAGNER, TB ;
KELLUM, JM ;
WELLING, RE ;
MOORE, EE .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1992, 216 (02) :172-183
[6]   ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE - AN AVOIDABLE COMPLICATION OF LEWIS-TANNER ESOPHAGECTOMY [J].
PATERSON, IM ;
WONG, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1989, 76 (02) :127-129
[7]  
Sauvanet A, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P1446
[8]   ESOPHAGOGASTROSTOMY ANASTOMOTIC LEAKS COMPLICATING ESOPHAGECTOMY - A REVIEW [J].
URSCHEL, JD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 169 (06) :634-640
[9]   Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: A controlled trial [J].
Valverde, A ;
Hay, JM ;
Fingerhut, A ;
Elhadad, A ;
Lorimier, G ;
Fagniez, PL ;
Rotman, N ;
Habib, E ;
Brassier, D ;
Pujol, JP ;
Teniere, P ;
Testart, J ;
Michot, F ;
Desrousseaux, B ;
Msika, S ;
Oberlin, P ;
Pouliquen, X ;
Vacher, B ;
Millat, B ;
Gayral, F ;
Vicq, P ;
Peyrard, P ;
Hennet, H ;
Flamant, Y ;
Zeitoun, G .
SURGERY, 1996, 120 (03) :476-483
[10]  
WONG J, 1987, SURGERY, V101, P408