Statistical segmentation of multidimensional brain datasets

被引:10
作者
Desco, M [1 ]
Gispert, JD [1 ]
Reig, S [1 ]
Santos, A [1 ]
Pascau, J [1 ]
Malpica, N [1 ]
Garcia-Barreno, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Gen Univ Gregorio Maranon, E-28007 Madrid, Spain
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING: 2001: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3 | 2001年 / 4322卷
关键词
MRI segmentation; robust segmentation; EM algorithm; Markov Random Fields; partial volume; logistic regression;
D O I
10.1117/12.431071
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper presents an automatic segmentation procedure for MRI neuroimages, that overcomes part of the problems involved in multidimensional clustering techniques like partial volume effects (PVE), processing speed and difficulty of incorporating a priori knowledge. The method is a three-stage procedure: 1) Exclusion of background and skull voxels using threshold-based region growing techniques with fully automated seed selection. 2) Expectation Maximization algorithms are used to estimate the probability density function (PDF) of the remaining pixels, which are assumed to be mixtures of gaussians. These pixels can then be classified into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), white matter and grey matter. Using this procedure, our method takes advantage of using the full covariance matrix (instead of the diagonal) for the joint PDF estimation. On the other hand, logistic discrimination techniques are more robust against violation of multi-gaussian assumptions. 3) A priori knowledge is added using Markov Random Field techniques. The algorithm has been tested with a dataset of 30 brain MRI studies (co-registered T1 and T2 MRI). Our method was compared with clustering techniques and with template-based statistical segmentation, using manual segmentation as a 'gold-standard'. Our results were more robust and closer to the gold-standard.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 193
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Multivariate Analysis
[2]  
ASHBURNER J, STAT PARAMETRIC MAPP
[3]   Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain [J].
Bullmore, ET ;
Suckling, J ;
Overmeyer, S ;
Rabe-Hesketh, S ;
Taylor, E ;
Brammer, MJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1999, 18 (01) :32-42
[4]  
CALDERON JM, 1998, THESIS U POLITECNICA
[5]   MRI SEGMENTATION - METHODS AND APPLICATIONS [J].
CLARKE, LP ;
VELTHUIZEN, RP ;
CAMACHO, MA ;
HEINE, JJ ;
VAIDYANATHAN, M ;
HALL, LO ;
THATCHER, RW ;
SILBIGER, ML .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1995, 13 (03) :343-368
[6]  
DEMPSTER AP, 1977, J ROYAL STAT SOC S B, V39
[7]   Medical image analysis: Progress over two decades and the challenges ahead [J].
Duncan, JS ;
Ayache, N .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 22 (01) :85-106
[8]   Spatial registration and normalization of images [J].
Friston, KJ ;
Ashburner, J ;
Frith, CD ;
Poline, JB ;
Heather, JD ;
Frackowiak, RSJ .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 1995, 3 (03) :165-189
[9]  
KELLER JM, 1985, IEEE T SYS MAN C SMC, V15
[10]   Partial-volume Bayesian classification of material mixtures in MR volume data using voxel histograms [J].
Laidlaw, DH ;
Fleischer, KW ;
Barr, AH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 17 (01) :74-86