Clinical and immunological comparison of smallpox vaccine administered to the outer versus the inner upper arms of vaccinia-naive adults

被引:7
作者
Waibel, KH
Golding, H
Manischewitz, J
King, LR
Tuchscherer, M
Topolski, RL
Walsh, DS
机构
[1] Dwight D Eisenhower Army Med Ctr, Dept Med, Allergy & Immunol Serv, Ft Gordon, GA 30905 USA
[2] Dwight D Eisenhower Army Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Ft Gordon, GA 30905 USA
[3] Augusta State Univ, Dept Psychol, Augusta, GA USA
[4] US FDA, Div Viral Prod, Ctr Biol Evaluat & Res, Bethesda, MD 20014 USA
[5] Walter Reed Army Inst Res, Dept Clin Trials, Silver Spring, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/499957
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Current recommendations direct health care providers to administer smallpox vaccine to the upper outer arm. However, concerns about cosmetically bothersome scarring, accidental contact transmission, interference by body tattoos, and even malignant transformation suggest evaluation of alternate vaccination sites is warranted. Methods. We randomized 20 vaccinia-naive adults to undergo smallpox vaccination on the outer (n=10) or inner (n=10) upper arm. Evaluations included major reaction ("take") rates and vaccination site cultures on postvaccination day 7, determination of serum vaccinia-specific neutralizing antibody titers on days 0 (prevaccination) and 21, and determination of adverse events. Results. On postvaccination day 7, a total of 18 participants ( 9 per group) had major reactions, 17 of whom had culture evidence of viable vaccinia. The inner and outer arm groups had similar major reaction mean sizes (P=.17), but the amount of erythema ( in square centimeters) was smaller in the inner arm group (P=.05). At day 21, all participants had higher titers of vaccinia-specific neutralizing antibodies, compared with at day 0, and the geometric mean titer values of the 2 vaccine groups were similar (P=.45). Adverse event rates were similar. Conclusion. The comparable clinical, immunological, and tolerability outcomes between smallpox vaccine applied to the conventional upper outer arm site versus the upper inner arm, coupled with modestly less vaccine-site erythema on the inner arm, indicate that the inner arm may be a suitable alternate vaccination site.
引用
收藏
页码:E16 / E20
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ANNUNZIATO D, 2003, CONT PEDIAT, V20, P62
[2]   Smallpox vaccination in 2003: Key information for clinicians [J].
Bartlett, J ;
Borio, L ;
Radonovich, L ;
Mair, JS ;
O'Toole, T ;
Mair, M ;
Halsey, N ;
Grow, R ;
Inglesby, TV .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 36 (07) :883-902
[3]  
CARR S, 1969, ENVIRON BEHAV, V1, P7
[4]  
*CDCP, 2003, EV TAK NONT
[5]   The smallpox saga and the origin(s) of vaccination [J].
Cook, GC .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF HEALTH, 1996, 116 (04) :253-255
[6]   Smallpox vaccine-induced antibodies are necessary and sufficient for protection against monkeypox virus [J].
Edghill-Smith, Y ;
Golding, H ;
Manischewitz, J ;
King, LR ;
Scott, D ;
Bray, M ;
Nalca, A ;
Hooper, JW ;
Whitehouse, CA ;
Schmitz, JE ;
Reimann, KA ;
Franchini, G .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2005, 11 (07) :740-747
[7]   Clinical responses to undiluted and diluted smallpox vaccine [J].
Frey, SE ;
Couch, RB ;
Tacket, CO ;
Treanor, JJ ;
Wolff, M ;
Newman, FK ;
Atmar, RL ;
Edelman, R ;
Nolan, CM ;
Belshe, RB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (17) :1265-1274
[8]   Duration of antiviral immunity after smallpox vaccination [J].
Hammarlund, E ;
Lewis, MW ;
Hansen, SG ;
Strelow, LI ;
Nelson, JA ;
Sexton, GJ ;
Hanifin, JM ;
Slifka, MK .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2003, 9 (09) :1131-1137
[9]  
Harrop Richard, 2004, Methods Mol Biol, V269, P243
[10]  
*HEALTH OW, FACT SHEET SMALLPOX