A randomized outpatient trial of a decision-support information technology tool

被引:46
作者
Apkon, M
Mattera, JA
Lin, ZQ
Herrin, J
Bradley, EH
Carbone, M
Holmboe, ES
Gross, CP
Selter, JG
Rich, A
Krumholz, HM
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Yale New Haven Hlth, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Sect Cardiovasc Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Sect Hlth Policy & Adm, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[5] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[6] Amer Board Internal Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.165.20.2388
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Decision-support information technology is often adopted to improve clinical decision making, but it is rarely rigorously evaluated. Congress mandated the evaluation of Problem-Knowledge Couplers (PKC Corp, Burlington, Vt), a decision-support tool. proposed for the Department of Defense's new health information network. Methods: This was a patient-level randomized trial conducted at 2 military practices. A total of 936 patients were allocated to the intervention group and 966 to usual care. Couplers were applied before routine ambulatory clinic visits. The primary outcome was quality of care, which was assessed based on the total percentage of any of 24 health care quality process measures (opportunities to provide evidence-based care) that were fulfilled. Secondary outcomes included medical resources consumed within 60 days of enrollment and patient and provider satisfaction. Results: There were 4639 health care opportunities (2374 in the Coupler group and 2265 in the usual-care group), with no difference in the proportion of opportunities fulfilled (33.9% vs 30.7%; P = .12). Although there was a modest improvement in performance on screening/preventive measures, it was offset by poorer performance on some measures of acute care. Coupler patients used more laboratory and pharmacy resources than usual-care patients (logarithmic mean difference, $71). No difference in patient satisfaction was observed between groups, and provider satisfaction was mixed. Conclusion: This study provides no strong evidence to support the utility of this decision-support tool, but it demonstrates the value of rigorous evaluation of decision-support information technology.
引用
收藏
页码:2388 / 2394
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CROSS QUAL CHASM NEW
[2]   Effects of a decision support system on physicians' diagnostic performance [J].
Berner, ES ;
Maisiak, RS ;
Cobbs, CG ;
Taunton, OD .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1999, 6 (05) :420-427
[3]   Influence of case and physician characteristics on perceptions of decision support systems [J].
Berner, ES ;
Maisiak, RS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1999, 6 (05) :428-434
[4]   PERFORMANCE OF 4 COMPUTER-BASED DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS [J].
BERNER, ES ;
WEBSTER, GD ;
SHUGERMAN, AA ;
JACKSON, JR ;
ALGINA, J ;
BAKER, AL ;
BALL, EV ;
COBBS, CG ;
DENNIS, VW ;
FRENKEL, EP ;
HUDSON, LD ;
MANCALL, EL ;
RACKLEY, CE ;
TAUNTON, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (25) :1792-1796
[5]  
Berner ES, 1999, CLIN DECISION SUPPOR
[6]   Evaluation of clinical information systems.: What can be evaluated and what cannot? [J].
Bürkle, T ;
Ammenwerth, E ;
Prokosch, HU ;
Dudeck, J .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 7 (04) :373-385
[7]   METHODS FOR COMPARING EVENT RATES IN INTERVENTION STUDIES WHEN THE UNIT OF ALLOCATION IS A CLUSTER [J].
DONNER, A ;
KLAR, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 140 (03) :279-289
[8]  
Donner A., 2010, Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research
[9]  
Drain M, 2001, J Ambul Care Manage, V24, P30
[10]   Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes - A systematic review [J].
Garg, AX ;
Adhikari, NKJ ;
McDonald, H ;
Rosas-Arellano, MP ;
Devereaux, PJ ;
Beyene, J ;
Sam, J ;
Haynes, RB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (10) :1223-1238