A unified approach to transient stability contingency filtering, ranking and assessment

被引:79
作者
Ernst, D
Ruiz-Vega, D
Pavella, M
Hirsch, PM
Sobajic, D
机构
[1] Univ Liege, Dept Elect Engn, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[2] Elect Power Res Inst, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
contingency filtering and ranking; dynamic security assessment; power system transient stability assessment and control; SIME method;
D O I
10.1109/59.932279
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper proposes a unified approach to contingency filtering, ranking and assessment in power system transient stability studies. The approach consists of two-block techniques in which the first block selects from a list of contingencies the a priori "interesting" ones, that the second block ranks and assesses. This Filtering, Ranking and Assessment (FILTRA) approach relies on SIME (for SIngle Machine Equivalent). SIME is a hybrid direct-time-domain stability method which combines accuracy and flexibility skills of time-domain methods with sound additional possibilities of direct methods. The FILTRA approach is fully general: it may adapt itself to the specifics of any power system (modeling, protection characteristics, etc.), any contingency scenario and mode of (in)stability (first- or multi-swing, local or inter-area mode) and any application context (planning, operation planning and real-time operation). The approach is illustrated on two ENV power systems, having different structures, control and protective devices. The adequacy of its filtering and ranking capabilities is illustrated in terms of performance criteria such as reliability (ability to consistently capture all dangerous contingencies), effectiveness (ability to avoid false alarms) and computational efficiency (ability to comply with real-time requirements). Further, the assessment task is shown to provide the operator with sound information and effective means of control.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 443
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Transient stability-constrained maximum allowable transfer [J].
Bettiol, AL ;
Wehenkel, L ;
Pavella, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1999, 14 (02) :654-659
[2]  
*CIGRE TASK FORC, 2000, 380217 CIGRE TASK FO, P210
[3]  
EJEBE GC, 1997 IEEE SUMM M PAN
[4]  
*EPRI, 1994, TR102004 EPRI
[5]  
*EPRI, 1995, TR105885 EPRI
[6]   THE TRANSIENT ENERGY FUNCTION-METHOD [J].
FOUAD, AA ;
VITTAL, V .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 1988, 10 (04) :233-246
[7]  
Pai M.A., 1989, ENERGY FUNCTION ANAL
[8]  
Pavella M., 1998, IEEE Power Engineering Review, V18, P50, DOI 10.1109/39.646963
[9]  
Pavella M., 2000, TRANSIENT STABILITY
[10]  
PAVELLA M, 1994, TRANSIENT STABILITY