Assessment of pain during medical procedures: A comparison of three scales

被引:163
作者
Jensen, MP
Miller, L
Fisher, LD
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Med Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Ctr Multidisciplinary Pain, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
关键词
pain measurement; pain assessment; abortion; procedural pain; reliability; validity;
D O I
10.1097/00002508-199812000-00012
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: Pain assessment is crucial to pain research. Knowledge about the strengths and weaknesses of pain measures is important to the continued advancement of our understanding of pain. The purpose of the present study was to compare the validity and utility of three measures of pain intensity during a medical procedure known to produce pain: an abortion. Design: Assignment to one of three pain intensity assessment instruments, which were subsequently used to assess pain during an abortion procedure. Comparison of the relative sensitivity of the measures to assess changes in pain using a series of repeated measures analyses of variance. The relative utility of the measures was compared by examining the rates of accurate responses to each. Subjects: Fifty-eight women presenting for a first-trimester abortion. Measures: Visual analog scale (VAS), the verbal 11-point Box Scale (Verbal BS-11), and the 21-point Box Scale (BS-21). Results: All three pain intensity measures detected changes in pain during the abortion procedure. Rates of incorrect responses were higher for the Verbal BS-11 and the VAS than for the BS-21. Conclusions: The results supported the validity of each of the three measures used, although some superiority for the BS-21 over the Verbal BS-11 and VAS exists. Patients had some difficulty completing the paper-and-pencil VAS during the procedure. In addition and consistent with previous research, some patients treated the Verbal BS-11 as a 21-point scale by responding with numbers between two whole numbers on the 0-10 measure. Overall, practical issues led us to conclude that the BS-21 is an excellent choice for assessing real-time abortion pain.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 349
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, CLIN J PAIN, DOI [10.1097/00002508-198712000-00003, DOI 10.1097/00002508-198712000-00003]
[2]   PAIN MEASUREMENT IN CANCER-PATIENTS - A COMPARISON OF 6 METHODS [J].
DECONNO, F ;
CARACENI, A ;
GAMBA, A ;
MARIANI, L ;
ABBATTISTA, A ;
BRUNELLI, C ;
LAMURA, A ;
VENTAFRIDDA, V .
PAIN, 1994, 57 (02) :161-166
[3]   AFFECT, PAIN, AND AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MEMORY [J].
EICH, E ;
RACHMAN, S ;
LOPATKA, C .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 99 (02) :174-178
[4]   MEMORY FOR PAIN - RELATION BETWEEN PAST AND PRESENT PAIN INTENSITY [J].
EICH, E ;
REEVES, JL ;
JAEGER, B ;
GRAFFRADFORD, SB .
PAIN, 1985, 23 (04) :375-379
[5]   A COMPARISON OF THE HOPKINS PAIN RATING INSTRUMENT WITH STANDARD VISUAL ANALOG AND VERBAL DESCRIPTOR SCALES IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER PAIN [J].
GROSSMAN, SA ;
SHEIDLER, VR ;
MCGUIRE, DB ;
GEER, C ;
SANTOR, D ;
PIANTADOSI, S .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1992, 7 (04) :196-203
[6]  
Hardy JD., 1952, PAIN SENSATIONS REAC
[7]  
Herr K A, 1993, Appl Nurs Res, V6, P39
[8]  
Huskisson E C, 1976, Rheumatol Rehabil, V15, P185
[9]  
HUSKISSON EC, 1982, J RHEUMATOL, V9, P768
[10]   The use of multiple-item scales for pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients [J].
Jensen, MP ;
Turner, LR ;
Turner, JA ;
Romano, JM .
PAIN, 1996, 67 (01) :35-40