Assessments of disability in women with rheumatoid arthritis in relation to grip force and pain

被引:41
作者
Nordenskiold, U
Grimby, G
机构
[1] Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital
关键词
rheumatoid arthritis; assistive devices; grip force; pain; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.3109/09638289709166440
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100232 [康复医学];
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess disability with the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and to evaluate the relationships between grip force, pain and difficulty in daily activities. Twenty women with rheumatoid arthritis were assessed with measurements of grip force and pain before and after grip test. Both the original HAQ version and an alternative rating model, not taking the use of assistive devices into account, were used. All patients reported pain which significantly increased after grip test and with a significant inverse correlation to grip force. All patients had assistive devices, on average 15 devices (range 1-27). Ninety-one per cent of the patient's devices were in continued use, most frequently in the categories; Eating, Grip and Hygiene. Disability was significantly correlated to pain, grip force and use of assistive devices. When using the alternative ratings of 20 questions in HAQ, 8 of the 20 questions showed significantly (p = 0.0003-0.0339) lower scoring, and the number of questions with significant correlations between grip force and disability increasing from 9 (r = 0.48-0.74, p = 0.039-0.001) to 14 questions (r = 0.47-0.74, p = 0.047-0.001). Difference between intrinsic disability (without assistive devices) and actual disability (with such assistance) is not reflected in original HAQ. The present study indicates that assessment of actual disability by the alternative rating model is more often correlated to impairment (grip force) than disability assessed by original HAQ and can be considered to give a better assessment of actual disability than the original HAQ model.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 19
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps
[2]
Bakheit A., 1995, CLIN REHABIL, V9, P234
[3]
BURKHARDT C, 1994, ARTHRIT CARE RES, V7, P169
[4]
EBERHARDT KB, 1988, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V27, P364
[5]
EKDAHL C, 1988, SCANDINAVIAN J RHEUM, V17, P63
[6]
MEASUREMENT OF PATIENT OUTCOME IN ARTHRITIS [J].
FRIES, JF ;
SPITZ, P ;
KRAINES, RG ;
HOLMAN, HR .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1980, 23 (02) :137-145
[7]
FRIES JF, 1983, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V22, P48
[8]
Guillemin F, 1992, Disabil Rehabil, V14, P71
[9]
REPORT OF A 3-YEAR STUDY ON THE SYSTEMIC AND ARTICULAR INDEXES IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS - THEORETIC AND CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
LANSBURY, J .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1958, 1 (06) :505-522
[10]
Nordenskiold U, 1990, Arthritis Care Res, V3, P158, DOI 10.1002/art.1790030308