The development of a systematic, aggregate measure of corporate social performance

被引:99
作者
Ruf, BM [1 ]
Muralidhar, K
Paul, K
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Coll Business & Econ, Dept Accounitng, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Miami, FL 33199 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80056-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Individuals, groups, and government units have developed considerable interested in evaluating the social performance of corporations. Evaluating corporate social performance (CSP) is important for researchers investigating the relationship between different organizational measures and CSP and for stakeholders employing social performance information in their decision making models. To assess CSP, an aggregate measure of CSP which incorporates both an independent assessment of actual performance and the individual value judgements of the stakeholder is needed. In this study, Mle propose a methodology for the development of a systematic measure of CSP using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. This multi-criteria decision making technique allows for the conversion of a multidimensional scale to a unidimensional scale, enabling analysis/comparison of companies both within the same industry and across industries. The technique is illustrated by developing a measure of CSP using several types of managers. The results indicate that there are large rank changes when individual value judgements are incorporated using relative importance weights.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 133
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] ABBOTT WF, 1979, ACAD MANAGE J, V22, P501, DOI 10.5465/255740
  • [2] ALEXANDER GJ, 1978, ACAD MANAGE J, V21, P479, DOI 10.5465/255728
  • [3] *AM I CERT PUBL AC, 1977, MEAS CORP SOC PERF
  • [4] ANDERSON JC, 1980, ACCOUNT REV, V55, P467
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1972, RISK MANAGEMENT
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
  • [7] SCALING OF CORPORATE MULTIVARIATE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA - SUBJECTIVE COMPOSITION VERSUS THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
    ARRINGTON, CE
    JENSEN, RE
    TOKUTANI, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 1982, 1 (02) : 95 - 123
  • [8] AUPPERLE KE, 1985, ACAD MANAGE J, V28, P446, DOI 10.5465/256210
  • [9] BELKAOUI, 1989, ACCOUNTING AUDITING, V2, P36
  • [10] BHAMBRI A, 1988, ACAD MANAGE J, V31, P642, DOI 10.5465/256463