Linear and nonlinear analysis of heart rate patterns associated with fetal behavioral states in the antepartum period

被引:62
作者
Goncalves, Hernani
Bernardes, Joao
Rocha, Ana Paula
Ayres-de-Campos, Diogo
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Ciencias, Dept Matemat Aplicada, P-4169007 Oporto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Dept Obstet & Ginecol, Fac Med, P-4100 Oporto, Portugal
[3] INEB, Oporto, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Ctr Matemat, P-4100 Oporto, Portugal
关键词
fetal heart rate; fetal behavioral states; computerized analysis; SisPorto; entropy; spectral analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.12.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Fetal behavioral states are important indicators of fetal physiology and pathology associated to typical fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns. Aim: To provide linear and nonlinear analysis of FHR patterns associated with fetal behavioral states regarding a better understanding of these states and patterns. Study design and subjects: Fifty FHR tracings from normal term pregnancies with a median duration of 40.3 min were acquired with the SisPorto (R)(b 2.01 system for computerized analysis of ca rdiotocog rams. Each tracing was divided into consecutive 10-minute segments and each segment was classified by two experts as pattern A, B, C or D. Outcome measures: Linear and nonlinear indices were computed in each segment, namely mean FHR, tong-term irregularity index (LTI), very low (VLF), low (LF) and high (HF) frequency spectral indices, approximate entropy (ApEn) and sample entropy (SampEn). Kappa statistic (K) and proportions of agreement (Pa) were used for assessment of inter-observer agreement. Bootstrap percentile confidence intervals and nonparametric statistical tests were calculated for statistical inference. Results: Overall agreement between experts in pattern classification was good to excellent with values for K and Pa of 0.74 (95% Cl: 0.64-0.94) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96), respectively. Most linear domain indices increased significantly with rising fetal activity whereas the opposite occurred with nonlinear indices, except for SampEn(2, 0. 1). LF/ (MF + HF) ratio also significantly increased with fetal activity, denoting an increased sympatho-vagal balance. Conclusions: Results support the hypothesis that entropy and linear variability indices measure different FHR features. FHR patterns associated with active steep (B) and active wakefulness (D) evidenced more signs of autonomous nervous system activity, with sympatho-vagat imbalance, and less signs related to complexity or irregularity control systems than patterns associated with calm steep (A) and calm wakefulness (C). (C) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 591
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Int J Gynecol Obstet
[2]  
Ayres-de Campos D, 2000, J Matern Fetal Med, V9, P311
[3]   Prediction of neonatal state by computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings:: the anteparturn arm of the SisPorto® multicentre validation study [J].
Ayres-de-Campos, D ;
Costa-Santos, C ;
Bernardes, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2005, 118 (01) :52-60
[4]   Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms [J].
Bernardes, J ;
CostaPereira, A ;
AyresdeCampos, D ;
vanGeijn, HP ;
PereiraLeite, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1997, 57 (01) :33-37
[5]   THE PORTO SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED CARDIOTOCOGRAPHIC SIGNAL ANALYSIS [J].
BERNARDES, J ;
MOURA, C ;
DESA, JPM ;
LEITE, LP .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1991, 19 (1-2) :61-65
[6]   A more objective fetal heart rate baseline estimation [J].
Bernardes, J ;
CostaPereira, A ;
vanGeijn, H ;
PereiraLeite, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (07) :714-715
[7]  
Boog G, 2004, ENCYCL MED CHIR, V148, P1
[8]  
Court DJ., 1984, RES PERINATAL MED, P113
[9]  
DAWES GS, 1992, OBSTET GYNECOL, V80, P763
[10]   Fractal analysis: A new method for evaluating fetal heart rate variability [J].
DiRenzo, GC ;
Montani, M ;
Fioriti, V ;
Clerici, G ;
Branconi, F ;
Pardini, A ;
Indraccolo, R ;
Cosmi, EV .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (03) :261-269