Environmental Regulation, Two-Way Foreign Direct Investment, and Green Innovation Efficiency in China's Manufacturing Industry

被引:96
作者
Feng, Zhijun [1 ]
Zeng, Bo [1 ]
Ming, Qian [1 ]
机构
[1] Dongguan Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Dongguan 523808, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
environmental regulation; two-way FDI; green innovation efficiency; industry heterogeneity; TRANSFER TECHNOLOGY; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; PRODUCTIVITY; BENEFIT; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph15102292
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper adopts 2009 to 2015 panel data from 27 manufacturing industries in China. A Super-SBM model is used to measure the green innovation efficiency (GIE) of China's manufacturing industry. A panel data model is then built to systematically examine the impact of environmental regulation (ER) and two-way foreign direct investment (FDI) on the GIE of China's manufacturing industry under a unified analysis framework. The results are as follows: (1) the overall level of the green innovation efficiency in China's manufacturing is low, and there is still great potential for improvement. Considering industry heterogeneity, the green innovation efficiency of patent-intensive manufacturing is significantly higher than that of non-patent-intensive manufacturing; (2) in terms of the whole manufacturing industry, ER and the interaction between ER and outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) have significantly negative effects on GIE, OFDI has significantly positive effects on GIE. (3) when considering industry heterogeneity, for patent-intensive manufacturing, ER and the interaction between ER and inward foreign direct investment (IFDI) have significantly negative effects on GIE, while IFDI has significantly positive effect on GIE. For non-patent-intensive manufacturing, ER and the interaction between ER and OFDI have significantly negative effects on GIE, while IFDI and the interaction between ER and IFDI have significantly positive effects on GIE.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] The Environment and Directed Technical Change
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Aghion, Philippe
    Bursztyn, Leonardo
    Hemous, David
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) : 131 - 166
  • [2] Ambec S., 2006, Energy Studies Review, V14, P601, DOI 10.15173/esr.v14i2.493
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, CHIN PHYS B
  • [4] [Anonymous], SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU10030724
  • [5] Arimura T.H., 2007, SOPHIA EC REV, V52, P1
  • [6] THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATIONS ON INDUSTRY PRODUCTIVITY - DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS
    BARBERA, AJ
    MCCONNELL, VD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1990, 18 (01) : 50 - 65
  • [7] Bi K, 2011, CHINA SOFT SCI, V9, P172
  • [8] Does foreign direct investment transfer technology across borders? New evidence
    Bitzer, Juergen
    Kerekes, Monika
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2008, 100 (03) : 355 - 358
  • [9] Foreign Direct Investment, Competition and Industry Performance
    Bitzer, Jurgen
    Goerg, Holger
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2009, 32 (02) : 221 - 233
  • [10] How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?
    Borensztein, E
    De Gregorio, J
    Lee, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 45 (01) : 115 - 135