Understanding the time-squeeze - Married couples' preferred and actual work-hour strategies

被引:85
作者
Clarkberg, M [1 ]
Moen, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Sociol, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/00027640121956683
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Many recent studies of the time-squeeze have used aggregate, trend data on work-hour behavior and inferred changing preferences among working men and women. This article begins with couple data and examines preferences as well as behavior in married-couple families. Work-hour behavior is conceptualized as an interaction between employee preferences, employer demands. and the institutional context. The article's analyses clearly indicate that there is a considerable disparity between couples' self-reports of preferences and their actual behavior: These results suggest that long work weeks generally do not reflect employee preferences but may result from constraints and demands imposed by the workplace. The rising sense of a time-squeeze in American society may stem from all-or-nothing assumptions about the nature and structure of work and the pressure to pur in long hours to be seen as committed productive, and having the potential for advancement.
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1136
页数:22
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   LABOR SUPPLY PREFERENCES, HOURS CONSTRAINTS, AND HOURS-WAGE TRADE-OFFS [J].
ALTONJI, JG ;
PAXSON, CH .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 1988, 6 (02) :254-276
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, TIME BIND WHEN WORK
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, RES LABOR EC
[4]  
AVERETT SL, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P276
[5]  
BAILYN L, 1993, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V34, P77
[6]  
Becker G., 1991, TREATISE FAMILY
[7]   Scaling back: Dual-earner couples' work-family strategies [J].
Becker, PE ;
Moen, P .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1999, 61 (04) :995-1007
[8]   Differences in work hours and hours preferences by race in the US [J].
Bell, LA .
REVIEW OF SOCIAL ECONOMY, 1998, 56 (04) :481-500
[9]  
Berk SarahFenstermaker., 1985, THE GENDER FACTORY
[10]   The macroeconomics of work time [J].
Bluestone, B ;
Rose, S .
REVIEW OF SOCIAL ECONOMY, 1998, 56 (04) :425-441