Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures

被引:58
作者
Kelly, IP [1 ]
Glisson, RR [1 ]
Fink, C [1 ]
Easley, ME [1 ]
Nunley, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/107110070102200710
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Jones fractures of the fifth metatarsal can be stabilized using intramedullary screw fixation techniques. A range of screw diameters from 4.5 mm to 6.5 mm can be used, but the optimal screw for this procedure has yet to be defined. In clinical practice, we have observed that failure is more likely when smaller diameter screws are used. Methods: Experimental Jones fractures were created in 23 pairs of human cadaver fifth metatarsals, which were fixed using either 5.0 mm or 6.5 mm screws. Fracture stiffness and pull-out strengths were measured for either screw type and their relationships with bone mineral density and medullary canal diameter were determined. Results: There was no significant difference in the bending stiffness of fractures stabilized with 5.0 mm and 6.5 mm screws; however, different mechanisms of failure were noted for either screw type. Poor thread purchase within the medullary canal was noted with the 5.0 mm screws, while excellent purchase was noted with 6.5 mm screws. Pull-out strength testing revealed significantly higher pullout strengths for the larger 6.5 mm screws. There was no significant difference in bone mineral density or medullary canal diameter between right and left metatarsals. Conclusions: Fifth metatarsals can often accommodate a 6.5 mm screw for the stabilization of Jones fractures. Larger diameter screws did not result in greater fracture stiffness in our model, but did result in significantly greater pull-out strengths. Clinical Relevance: Larger diameter screws may be more appropriate for intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 589
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Arangio G, 1992, Foot Ankle, V13, P547
[2]  
Dameron Jr, 1995, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, V3, P110
[3]  
Dameron T B Jr, 1975, J Bone Joint Surg Am, V57, P788
[4]   STRESS-FRACTURE OF THE 5TH METATARSAL [J].
DELEE, JC ;
EVANS, JP ;
JULIAN, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1983, 11 (05) :349-353
[5]   Analysis of failed surgical management of fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: The Jones fracture [J].
Glasgow, MT ;
Naranja, RJ ;
Glasgow, SG ;
Torg, JS .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 17 (08) :449-457
[6]  
Jones R, 1902, ANN SURG, V35, P697
[7]   JONES FRACTURE REVISITED [J].
KAVANAUGH, JH ;
BROWER, TD ;
MANN, RV .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1978, 60 (06) :776-782
[8]   JONES FRACTURES AND RELATED FRACTURES OF THE PROXIMAL 5TH METATARSAL [J].
LAWRENCE, SJ ;
BOTTE, MJ .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1993, 14 (06) :358-365
[9]   OUTPATIENT PERCUTANEOUS SCREW FIXATION OF THE ACUTE JONES FRACTURE [J].
MINDREBO, N ;
SHELBOURNE, KD ;
VANMETER, CD ;
RETTIG, AC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1993, 21 (05) :720-723
[10]   A densitometric analysis of the human first metatarsal bone [J].
Muehleman, C ;
Bareither, D ;
Manion, BL .
JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 1999, 195 :191-197