In situ rhamnolipid production at an abandoned petroleum refinery

被引:16
作者
Cassidy, DP [1 ]
Hudak, AJ
Werkema, D
Atekwana, EA
Rossbach, S
Duris, JW
Atekwana, EA
Sauck, WA
机构
[1] Western Michigan Univ, Dept Geosci, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Dept Geol & Geophys, Rolla, MO USA
[3] Western Michigan Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
[4] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Dept Geol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
来源
SOIL & SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION | 2002年 / 11卷 / 05期
关键词
biosurfactant; groundwater; hydrocarbon; rhamnolipid; surface tension;
D O I
10.1080/20025891107087
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A simple screening method was developed to detect in situ biosurfactant production by exploiting the relationship between surface tension (ST) and surfactant concentration. Filtered groundwater from contaminated wells with ST values of 60 to 70 dynes/cm decreased to 29 dynes/cm after being concentrated 10 to 15 times in a rotary evaporator, indicating that biosurfactants in the sample reached the critical micelle concentration (CMC). Samples from uncontaminated groundwater concentrated 25 times showed no decrease in ST below 72 dynes/cm, suggesting that biosurfactants were not present. Microorganisms from soil cores were cultured on diesel fuel and identified using fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was found at very low numbers in uncontaminated soil but was the dominant species in contaminated soil, indicating that hydrocarbon release impacted microbial diversity significantly. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to quantify rhamnolipids, biosurfactants produced by P. aeruginosa, in concentrated groundwater samples. Rhamnolipid concentrations in samples from contaminated soil were observed equal to their CMC (50 mg/L), but were not detected in samples from uncontaminated wells. We conclude that biosurfactant production may be an indicator of intrinsic bioremediation.
引用
收藏
页码:769 / 787
页数:19
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Investigations of geoelectrical signatures at a hydrocarbon contaminated site [J].
Atekwana, EA ;
Sauck, WA ;
Werkema, DD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2000, 44 (2-3) :167-180
[2]   Influence of cation type, ionic strength, and pH on solubilization and mobilization of residual hydrocarbon by a biosurfactant [J].
Bai, GY ;
Brusseau, ML ;
Miller, RM .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 1998, 30 (3-4) :265-279
[3]   Biosurfactant-enhanced removal of residual hydrocarbon from soil [J].
Bai, GY ;
Brusseau, ML ;
Miller, RM .
JOURNAL OF CONTAMINANT HYDROLOGY, 1997, 25 (1-2) :157-170
[4]   Characterization of biosurfactants and their use in pollution removal state of the art (Review) [J].
Banat, IM .
ACTA BIOTECHNOLOGICA, 1995, 15 (03) :251-267
[5]  
Bossert I.D., 1995, MICROBIAL TRANSFORMA, P77
[6]  
Cassidy D.P., 2001, J ENV ENG GEOPHYS, V6, P47, DOI DOI 10.4133/JEEG6.1.47
[7]   Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated ground water: The perspectives of history and hydrology [J].
Chapelle, FH .
GROUND WATER, 1999, 37 (01) :122-132
[8]   Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential [J].
Desai, JD ;
Banat, IM .
MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1997, 61 (01) :47-&
[9]   Genetic diversity through the looking glass: Effect of enrichment bias [J].
Dunbar, J ;
White, S ;
Forney, L .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 63 (04) :1326-1331
[10]  
Eaton A. D., Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, V20th