Evaluation of root resorption following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography

被引:101
作者
Baysal, Asli [3 ]
Karadede, Irfan [4 ]
Hekimoglu, Seyit [4 ]
Ucar, Faruk [5 ]
Ozer, Torun [4 ]
Veli, Ilknur [4 ]
Uysal, Tancan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Katip Celebi Univ, Dis Hekimligi Fak, Ortodonti Anabilim Dali, Izmir, Turkey
[2] King Saud Univ, Dept Pediat Dent & Orthodont, Coll Dent, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] Kocaeli Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Kocaeli, Turkey
[4] Dicle Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Diyarbakir, Turkey
[5] Erciyes Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Kayseri, Turkey
关键词
Root resorption; Rapid maxillary expansion; Cone-beam computed tomography; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; SURFACE RESORPTION; TOOTH MOVEMENT; UPPER INCISORS;
D O I
10.2319/060411-367.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
100302 [口腔临床医学];
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the root resorption after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Records of 25 patients who had undergone RME with tooth-borne banded expander were obtained from the archive of the orthodontic department. CBCT data were reconstructed with surface and volume rendering, and the volumetric images were manipulated to display the root surfaces from various orientations. On these three-dimensional images, permanent first molars and first and second premolars were segmented, and their roots were isolated. Volumes of roots were calculated. The difference between pre-expansion and postexpansion root volumes was statistically evaluated with a paired-samples t-test. Also, the percentage of root volume loss was calculated for each root and statistically compared with each other with one-way analysis of variance at the P < .05 level. Results: The difference between the pre-expansion and postexpansion root volumes was statistically significant for all roots investigated. Maximum volume decrease was observed for the mesiobuccal root of first molar teeth (18.60 mm(3)). It was determined that the distobuccal root of first molar teeth was less affected from the expansion procedure (9.47 mm(3)). No statistically significant difference was found for the percentage of root volume loss. Conclusion: Following RME treatment, significant root volume loss was observed for all investigated posterior teeth. However, the percentage of volume loss was not statistically different among roots. (Angle Orthod. 2012;82:488-494.)
引用
收藏
页码:488 / 494
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Three-dimensional analysis of pulp chambers in maxillary second deciduous molars [J].
Amano, M. ;
Agematsu, H. ;
Abe, S. ;
Usami, A. ;
Matsunaga, S. ;
Suto, K. ;
Ide, Y. .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2006, 34 (07) :503-508
[2]
Angell DH, 1860, DENT COSMOS, V1, P540
[3]
[Anonymous], 1975, T EUR ORTHOD SOC
[4]
RAPID MAXILLARY EXPANSION AND EXTERNAL ROOT RESORPTION IN MAN - A SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPE STUDY [J].
BARBER, AF ;
SIMS, MR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1981, 79 (06) :630-652
[5]
APICAL ROOT RESORPTION IN ORTHODONTICALLY TREATED SUBJECTS - ANALYSIS OF EDGEWISE AND LIGHT WIRE MECHANICS [J].
BECK, BW ;
HARRIS, EF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1994, 105 (04) :350-361
[6]
Chan E K M, 2004, Orthod Craniofac Res, V7, P64, DOI 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2004.00280.x
[7]
APICAL ROOT RESORPTION OF UPPER INCISORS CAUSED BY INTRUSIVE TOOTH MOVEMENT - A RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY [J].
DERMAUT, LR ;
DEMUNCK, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1986, 90 (04) :321-326
[8]
Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution [J].
Dudic, Alexander ;
Giannopoulou, Catherine ;
Leuzinger, Michael ;
Kiliaridis, Stavros .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 135 (04) :434-437
[9]
Ericson S, 2000, ANGLE ORTHOD, V70, P276
[10]
A COMPARISON OF 2 DIFFERENT RAPID PALATAL EXPANSION TECHNIQUES FROM THE POINT OF ROOT RESORPTION [J].
ERVERDI, N ;
OKAR, I ;
KUCUKKELES, N ;
ARBAK, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1994, 106 (01) :47-51