Comparison of smooth-gel hyaluronic acid dermal fillers with cross-linked bovine collagen: A multicenter, double-masked, randomized, within-subject study

被引:126
作者
Baumann, Leslie S. [1 ]
Shamban, Ava T. [2 ]
Lupo, Mary P. [3 ]
Monheit, Gary D. [4 ]
Thomas, Jane A. [5 ]
Murphy, Diane K. [5 ]
Walker, Patricia S. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Cosmet Ctr, Miami Beach, FL 33140 USA
[2] Laser Inst Derm & European Skin Care, Santa Monica, CA USA
[3] Tulane Univ, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[4] Total Skin & Beauty Dermatol Ctr, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Allergan, Santa Barbara, CA USA
关键词
TOLERABILITY; EFFICACY; ZYPLAST; BLIND;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33352.x
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND A new family of next-generation non-animal hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers was approved by the FDA in June 2006. Compared with other HA fillers available in the United States at the time of writing, these new fillers have a higher concentration of HA, higher concentration of cross-linked HA, and a smooth consistency-which should promote long-lasting corrections and a smooth, natural look and feel postinjection. OBJECTIVE The objective was to compare the effectiveness and safety of these smooth-gel HA dermal fillers with bovine collagen for nasolabial fold (NLF) correction. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 439 subjects with moderate or severe NLFs received one of three types of smooth-gel HA dermal filler (in one NLF) and cross-linked bovine collagen (in the other NLF) and were evaluated for <= 24 weeks. RESULTS All three HA dermal fillers achieved considerably longer-lasting clinical correction than bovine collagen; 81% to 90% of HA dermal filler-treated NLFs maintained a clinically significant improvement from baseline for >= 6 months. Up to 88% of subjects preferred the HA dermal fillers over bovine collagen. All fillers were similarly well tolerated. CONCLUSION The smooth-gel HA dermal fillers offer longer-lasting correction than bovine collagen-which may lessen the frequency that repeat treatments are needed. Also, they were preferred by the vast majority of subjects-which should promote patient satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页码:S128 / S135
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
*ALL IN, 2006, HYLAFORM PROD INF
[2]  
*AM SOC AESTH PLAS, 2006, 2005 COSM SURG NAT D
[3]  
BERGERETGALLEY C, 2004, ANESTHET SURG J, V23, P33
[4]  
*FDA, 2003, TRANSC 21 NOV 2003 M
[5]  
*FDA, 2006, SUMM SAF EFF DAT
[6]  
FDA, 2003, SUMM SAF EFF DAT
[7]  
GRIMES PE, 2006, AC 06 M AM AC DERM
[8]   Reliable soft tissue augmentation - A clinical comparison of injectable soft-tissue fillers for facial-volume augmentation [J].
Kanchwala, SK ;
Holloway, L ;
Bucky, LP .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2005, 55 (01) :30-35
[9]   A randomized, evaluator-blind, multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of Perlane versus Zyplast in the correction of nasolabial folds [J].
Lindqvist, C ;
Tveten, S ;
Bondevik, BE ;
Fagrell, D .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 115 (01) :282-289
[10]  
*MED INS INC, 2006, DERM FILL PROD COMP