Predicting clinical end points: Treatment nomograms in prostate cancer

被引:28
作者
Di Blasio, CJ
Rhee, AC
Cho, D
Scardino, PT
Kattan, MW
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0093-7754(03)00351-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Due to the generally indolent nature of prostate cancer, patients must decide among a wide range of treatments, which will significantly affect both quality of life and survival. Thus, there is a need for instruments to aid patients and their physicians in decision analysis. Nomograms are instruments that predict outcomes for the individual patient. Using algorithms that incorporate multiple variables, nomograms calculate the predicted probability that a patient will reach a clinical end point of interest. Nomograms tend to outperform both expert clinicians and predictive instruments based on risk grouping. We outline principles for nomogram construction, including considerations for choice of clinical end points and appropriate predictive variables, and methods for model validation. Currently, nomograms are available to predict progression-free probability after several primary treatments for localized prostate cancer. There is need for additional models that predict other clinical end points, especially survival adjusted for quality of life. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 586
页数:20
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]   LONG-TERM SURVIVAL AMONG MEN WITH CONSERVATIVELY TREATED LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
ALBERTSEN, PC ;
FRYBACK, DG ;
STORER, BE ;
KOLON, TF ;
FINE, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (08) :626-631
[2]  
*AM JOINT COMM CAN, 1992, AJCC CANC STAG MAN
[3]   Defining prostate specific antigen progression after radical prostatectomy: What is the most appropriate cut point? [J].
Amling, CL ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Blute, ML ;
Slezak, JM ;
Zincke, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (04) :1146-1151
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, V37, P1035
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, AJCC CANC STAGING MA
[6]   The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI - A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making [J].
Antman, EM ;
Cohen, M ;
Bernink, PJLM ;
McCabe, CH ;
Horacek, T ;
Papuchis, G ;
Mautner, B ;
Corbalan, R ;
Radley, D ;
Braunwald, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (07) :835-842
[7]   CONTROL OF PROSTATE-CANCER WITH RADIOTHERAPY - LONG-TERM RESULTS [J].
BAGSHAW, MA ;
COX, RS ;
HANCOCK, SL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (05) :1781-1785
[8]   Biostatistical modeling using traditional preoperative and pathological prognostic variables in the selection of men at high risk for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer [J].
Bauer, JJ ;
Connelly, RR ;
Seterhenn, IA ;
Deausen, J ;
Srivastava, S ;
McLeod, DG ;
Moul, JW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) :929-933
[9]  
Begg CB, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P1997, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20000815)19:15<1997::AID-SIM511>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-C