Self-reported prevalence of prostate-specific antigen testing in South Australia: a community study

被引:24
作者
Pinnock, CB
Weller, DP
Marshall, VR
机构
[1] Repatriat Gen Hosp, Div Surg, Daw Pk, SA 5041, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ S Australia, Dept Evidence Based Care & Gen Practice, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[3] Flinders Univ S Australia, Flinders Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb141473.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the prevalence and other characteristics of self-reported blood testing (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) for prostate cancer in the community. Design: Interview-based prevalence study. Participants and setting: 695 men aged 40 years and over in the Spring 1996 South Australian Health Omnibus survey of a probability sample of 3011 households, weighted to reflect the age and sex distribution of the South Australian population. Outcome measures: Number of men who had a PSA test in the preceding 12 months; number of first tests; the person initiating and performing the test; knowledge of the next step if test result abnormal; number of men visiting doctor for lower urinary tract symptoms in the preceding 12 months. Results: 20.3% of participants reported having a PSA test in the preceding 12 months; 62.1% were first tests. Prevalence of testing was highest in the age group 70-79 years (35.8%). Most tests were initiated by the general practitioner (41.2%) and by patients (35.7%). Of those tested, 45.3% had inadequate knowledge of the next step. Visiting a doctor for urinary symptoms was significantly associated with PSA testing (P<0.001): 47.7% of men who visited a doctor for urinary symptoms had been tested compared with only 17.4% of those who did not visit the doctor for this problem. Only age and visiting a doctor for urinary symptoms were significant independent predictors of having a PSA test. Conclusions: Investigation of lower urinary tract symptoms contributed substantially to PSA testing, and those tested did not adequately understand the consequences. Our findings suggest a need for a better framework for PSA testing in general practice, including all important elements of decision-making, such as evidence and patient preference, as well as the means to ensure adequate patient counselling before testing.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 28
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Australian Health Technology Advisory Committee AHTAC, 1996, PROST CANC SCREEN
[2]  
Coley CM, 1997, ANN INTERN MED, V126, P480
[3]  
DENIS LJ, 1992, PROSTATE, P63
[4]  
Diefenbach P N, 1996, J Cancer Educ, V11, P39
[5]   The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer [J].
Flood, AB ;
Wennberg, JE ;
Nease, RF ;
Fowler, FJ ;
Ding, J ;
Hynes, LM .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 11 (06) :342-349
[6]  
GOHAGAN JK, 1995, CANCER, V75, P1869, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950401)75:7+<1869::AID-CNCR2820751617>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-7
[8]  
HAHN DL, 1993, J FAM PRACTICE, V37, P432
[9]   Screening for prostate cancer: The case against [J].
Hirst, GHL ;
Ward, JE ;
DelMar, CB .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1996, 164 (05) :285-288
[10]  
KISH L, 1965, SURVEY SAMPLING, P257