Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States

被引:257
作者
Ioannou, GN
Chapko, MK
Dominitz, JA
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Hlth Serv Res & Dev, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, NW Hepatitis C Resource Ctr, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9270(03)00423-4
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to identify predictors of colorectal cancer screening in the United States and subgroups with particularly low rates of screening. METHODS: The responses to a telephone-administered questionnaire of a nationally representative sample of 61,068 persons aged greater than or equal to50 yr were analyzed. Current screening was defined as either sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the preceding 5 years or fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) in the preceding year, or both. RESULTS: Overall, current colorectal cancer screening was reported by 43.4% (sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy by 22.8%, FOBT by 9.9%, and both by 10.7%). The lowest rates of screening were reported by the following subgroups: those aged 50-54 yr (31.2%), Hispanics (31.2%), Asian/Pacific Islanders (34.8%), those with education less than the ninth grade (34.4%), no health care coverage (20.4%), or coverage by Medicaid (29.2%), those who had no routine doctor's visit in the last year (20.3%), and every-day smokers (32.1%). The most important modifiable predictors of current colorectal cancer screening were health care coverage (OR = 1.7, 95% Cl = 1.5-1.9) and a routine doctor's visit in the last year (OR = 3.5, 95% Cl = 3.2-3.8). FOBT was more common in women than in men (OR = 1.8, 95% Cl = 1.6-2.0); sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy was more common in Hispanics (OR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7) and Asian/Pacific Islanders (OR = 2.4, 95% Cl 1.5-3.9) relative to whites, in persons without routine doctor's visits in the preceding year (OR = 3.3, 95% CI = 2.8-4), and in persons with poor self-reported health (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.2-1.5). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions should be developed to improve screening for the subgroups who reported the lowest screening rates. Such interventions may incorporate individual screening strategy preferences. (C) 2003 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterology.
引用
收藏
页码:2082 / 2091
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   HAS THE USE OF CERVICAL, BREAST, AND COLORECTAL-CANCER SCREENING INCREASED IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
ANDERSON, LM ;
MAY, DS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (06) :840-842
[2]   THE KNOWLEDGE AND USE OF SCREENING-TESTS FOR COLORECTAL AND PROSTATE-CANCER - DATA FROM THE 1987 NATIONAL-HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEY [J].
BROWN, ML ;
POTOSKY, AL ;
THOMPSON, GB ;
KESSLER, LG .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1990, 19 (05) :562-574
[3]   THE EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER IN THE PRIMARY-CARE SETTING - FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ACCEPTANCE AND COMPLETION OF RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES [J].
BURACK, RC ;
LIANG, J .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1987, 16 (06) :739-751
[4]   American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: Update 1997 [J].
Byers, T ;
Levin, B ;
Rothenberger, D ;
Dodd, GD ;
Smith, RA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1997, 47 (03) :154-&
[5]  
*CDCP, 1996, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V275, P830
[6]  
*CDCP, 1999, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V281, P1581
[7]  
Close DR, 1998, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V7, P627
[8]  
Dominitz JA, 1997, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V92, P2171
[9]  
Erban S, 2001, Eff Clin Pract, V4, P10
[10]   Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population [J].
Frazier, AL ;
Colditz, GA ;
Fuchs, CS ;
Kuntz, KM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (15) :1954-1961