Strong monotonicity in surplus sharing

被引:11
作者
Friedman, EJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Sch Operat Res & Ind Engn, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
surplus sharing; monotonicity; cost allocation; axiomatic analysis; almost flat; spread;
D O I
10.1007/s00199-003-0377-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We consider three new axioms for surplus sharing problems. The first is strong monotonicity which says that workers should be rewarded for increases in productivity and the second says that productive workers should receive some compensation. The third requires that the surplus sharing rule should be well defined (and continuous on) the set of threshold functions. We show that none of the standard 'equitable' mechanisms satisfy any of these axioms and then present a constructive characterization of mechanisms which do. Using this we construct several new mechanisms. These are the Almost Flat mechanism, the Spread Aumann-Shapley mechanism, and the Spread Serial mechanism, which have many desirable properties.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 658
页数:16
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
ALOYSIUS J, 1998, SELECTION JOINT PROJ
[2]  
Aumann R. J., 1974, Values of Non-Atomic Games
[3]  
Bertsekas Dimitri P., 1989, PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED
[4]   INTERNAL TELEPHONE BILLING RATES - NOVEL APPLICATION OF NON-ATOMIC GAME THEORY [J].
BILLERA, LJ ;
HEATH, DC ;
RAANAN, J .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1978, 26 (06) :956-965
[5]   ALLOCATION OF SHARED COSTS - A SET OF AXIOMS YIELDING A UNIQUE PROCEDURE [J].
BILLERA, LJ ;
HEATH, DC .
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1982, 7 (01) :32-39
[6]  
Champsaur P., 1975, International Journal of Game Theory, V4, P113, DOI 10.1007/BF01780629
[7]  
Clark D. D., 1992, Computer Communication Review, V22, P14, DOI 10.1145/144191.144199
[8]   Three methods to share joint costs or surplus [J].
Friedman, E ;
Moulin, H .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1999, 87 (02) :275-312
[9]  
FRIEDMAN EJ, 1998, UNPUB PATHS CONSISTE
[10]   Value theory without symmetry [J].
Haimanko, O .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GAME THEORY, 2000, 29 (03) :451-468